Aaron
Member
Senior Forumite
Posts: 2,369
|
Post by Aaron on May 4, 2011 2:46:57 GMT
Gotta disagree with you on the H/T grips Hiroshi. The grips are designed to be used with thick gloves. The problem is that most of us backyard cutters don't use gloves. However, the line was imagined as having blunts for training, and then matching sharps for cutting. So the blunts have to have thin grips because why in the hell would you not wear gloves while sparring? And then in the effort to make them match feel and performance wise, the sharps also have to have thin grips. Unfortunately that leaves us non-glove-users a bit miffed but there is a distinct design purpose behind them. Personally my biggest problem with the EMSHS isn't the grip size (It's about the same as my Fullered Bastard, which after some new leather actually is my favorite grip to use), but the large diameter of the disc pommel. Personally I believe a type J pommel (and getting a new leather wrap) would fix every issue with the perception of the grip. But I know you didn't mean to come off in a derogatory way, I just felt some clarification would be useful. As for your $400/$800 sword comparison, it doesn't really apply because (if we're comparing a current Atrim to a gussied up one with an inflated cost to reflect the extra work) they're both still designed by Gus for performance. One is just more elaborately designed aesthetically. Personally I wouldn't mind paying Albion- or near-Albion prices for an Atrim with more 'polished' hilt designs. Because it will every bit have the performance AND looks to back that asking price. However that doesn't mean I think Gus should ONLY offer those kinds of swords. It would be worth looking into (in my opinion) to do two lines; one is his normal offerings, so the people more satisfied with the performance for the price can still have the swords available to them, as well as the more 'fancy' line for people who want the legendary performance Gus is known for, but also want a sword that looks, well, sexy.
|
|
|
Post by Nathan Robinson on May 4, 2011 3:15:20 GMT
My world isn't black and white. I want both.
As a consumer, we have many possible combinations available to us. There are swords that perform well at many price points. There are swords that are historically inspired at many price points. There are swords that are well-finished and exhibit good design characteristics at many price points. Luckily, there are some products that have all these things at reasonable price points, too. It's a good time to be a consumer.
|
|
TomK
Member
Senior Forumite
Posts: 2,377
|
Post by TomK on May 4, 2011 3:27:24 GMT
this is true, and we don't deny it. the point here is one must be careful how things are changed and if Gus went around changing things in a reactionary fashion it wouldn't take long before the swords he was making would no longer stand up to the standard he has set for his products. it is indeed a good time to be a consumer and we intend to make it a better time to be a consumer by doing our part in offering excellent quality swords that will continue to improve.
I firmly believe the golden age for ATrims is yet to come. more on this story as it develops.
|
|
Sean (Shadowhowler)
VIP Reviewer
Retired Moderator
No matter where you go, there you are.
Posts: 8,828
|
Post by Sean (Shadowhowler) on May 4, 2011 3:30:24 GMT
:cry: That is hitting below the belt man...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2011 3:45:51 GMT
It's been, like, over a year now. Isn't it about time we sweep that under the ru- ...bad choice of words.... :?
|
|
|
Post by Cold Napalm on May 4, 2011 4:08:34 GMT
Why would the 800 dollar sword lack performace? That is the price of A&A and albions and they have looks AND performance. So the better question is what woul you pay for, a 400 dollar performance sword or a 800 dollar performance and looks sword...and my answer is YES.
That maybe true...but unless you already know about gus blades, perception is what matters. When the sword line looks like it has parts "slapped" together due to some poor choices in fittings, that hurts gus, that hurts you guys. And the key word is LOOKS. And even though I know how good his swords are, some of the fitting choices he has been making lately is SO bad that it would even keep me from picking one up and I know his swords to be awesome. If your new and you have no idea...well good luck on the sale.
Did you bother to READ?!? I said thicker and smaller diameter. The weight should not change one bit. You seem to be under the mistaken impression that I am somebody who is clueless about swords.
Okay lets leave H/T alone for a second (those grips are that size as a part of the design). So then your telling me christian fletcher makes hit fitting poorly then? Albion? A&A? Jake Powning? And that windlass and gen 2 and CAS are making the correct pommel designs over those makers. You can try to defend your product...but this ain't something your gonna win. It just looks cheap because the design is one that the cheap sword makers use...not the better ones. It's like having a ferrari engine and chassis in a pinto sheetmetal. Yeah it's GREAT performance...but why are you making it look like a pinto on purpose when you don't have to?!?
And it's not like the changes I suggested should change the price one bit. A striaght tapered oval handle isn't significantly harder to make then the handles now. A thicker pommel of a smaller diameter is equally difficult to make and since it weights the same, the material cost will be equal. Using rounded leather for the risers should be CHEAPER then the thick flat bits he is using and the type 1 cross is actually easier to fabricate then a type 6.
|
|
|
Post by 14thforsaken on May 4, 2011 4:22:19 GMT
I've been lurking in this thread for a while and wasn't going to post anything, BUT if you are asking for feedback about the perception of the product you are selling; it is counterproductive in the extreme to get into an argument with someone about their perception. It's THEIR perception and its what YOU were asking to hear about. If you didn't want the feedback, you shouldn't have asked.
Try to take it constructively and learn from it. Arguing with someone over their opinion doesn't help anyone.
Not trying to stir things up, but I hate it when people ask for opinions and then seem to get upset when they hear them.
Now as far as feedback, I may be an oddity but if I'm going to pay $400 or so for a sword, I'm more likely to go ahead and pay double or triple that if necessary to get exactly what I want. That just happens to be my threshold price where I can't justify spending that much unless it has all the bells and whistles I want. Generally, I can always find a very good sword that meets my base requirements at around the $300-350 price point if i am patient and look around on the various classifieds.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2011 4:40:42 GMT
Tom
I have just recently started up collecting swords again and while most of the swords I already own are katana, I am now definitely more interested in medieval European swords than any other type of sword. The Atrim swords really appeal to me and the only reason I don't own one yet is that at the moment I just can't afford the cost. Soon I will be in a better financial position and plan on buying some Atrim swords.
So here is my impression of Atrim swords. I wanted to preface this with the statement that I have neither owned nor handled an Atrim. My opinion of Atrim swords is based on reviews, pictures, posts, and descriptions / stats from your website.
Performance. Balance and harmonics. It is my understanding that Atrim swords are generally equal to or better than any other sword in this aspect. I personally put more weight on this aspect than any other aspect of a sword.
Strength. I actually consider this as important as performance. Atrim swords from what I have learned are well designed and very strong, yet still maintain excellent handling characteristics unlike some other sword lines which may be strong, but are overweight and as a result don't handle properly.
Cost. While Atrim swords aren't priced in the lower end of the market and nor should they be, I feel that you receive a lot of sword for the money. I also like the fact that I don't have to pay for a scabbard. I am glad that Gus keeps the cost of the swords down by not including those things which can easily be added as custom options.
Aesthetics. I feel the fit of the parts is excellent and the finish suited to how a sword should be used. I actually like the "spartan" look of most of the Atrim swords. I don't care for a lot of the "flash" I see on some other manufacturers swords.
Customizable. I prefer the hex nut construction because it allows for easier customization. How the grip on a sword should be designed is very subjective thing. If I feel the need to modify the grip to suit my needs it is easy to do. If I feel the need to change the finish on any other part of the sword, again no big deal.
Anyhow I hope this is the type of feedback you were looking to receive. I look forward to, in a few of months (hopefully), buying my first of several Atrim swords.
|
|
TomK
Member
Senior Forumite
Posts: 2,377
|
Post by TomK on May 4, 2011 5:21:48 GMT
ok guys this thread is starting to get a bit out of hand and tempers are flaring.
I wanted to address the idea that things were slapped together and I wanted to see if the impression of being slapped together was something that was more prevelant or maybe just a few people.
I now know that no-one really sees the swords as actually being slapped together but there is a small number of people who feel that they look like they were even though they know they weren't.
there's no need to argue about this opinions belong to their people.
we have received some valuable feedback from this thread and I apreciate the honesty and candor expressed here.
it seems to me that there is not being any real progress made any more so I'm going to make a statement and then a request.
statement: as I have said there is no problem that exists with our swords that Gus is not aware of even before the sword hits the shelves of TTA. there's no news flash here. we have been able with this thread to measure the amount of concern over certain features and we will take that concern into account. Mercenary swords will continue to be made and sold at the best price we can offer. as we build momentum and money we will embark on projects that will improve our offerings so there will be options for our customers to upgrade from the Mercenary level. we already are offering improved polishes and even though it isn't on our web site yet we can do permanent assembly. we aren't stopping there there's more to come. there's also new designs in the works and Gus recent designs have been far and away the best swords he's ever made.
Request: if you have something new to add here, if there is something about our swords you are concerned about, would like to see, believe to be true, etc. and it has not already been discussed please feel free to ask. I will not bite your head off for it no matter how crazy it might be. I might tell you that you are very much mistaken and I would like to inform you what the truth actually is, but I promise I will not be mean or disrespectful or anything nasty like that. we have beaten a few horses to death here and I think it is time they were buried.
thank you all for your input it is valued and valid.
|
|
|
Post by Sneakypete on May 4, 2011 6:07:13 GMT
Love my single ATrim, love T&TA, love what they do: put high-end swords in the hands of people who otherwise might not be able to afford em. My new XIIa.4 isn't as pretty as some other high-enders out there; the finish is a little rough. I knew what I'd be getting though, when I ordered a merc-grade, and I couldn't be happier with it. My thoughts are that the grip, guard and pommel are exactly what they're meant to be: perfectly tuned for optimum balance. If I decide I don't like how they look, I can always shine em up myself, or play around with some new grip-leather. Tom, Hiroshi, you boys keep doing what you do. As soon as my leg heals right, and my pockets fill up, I might just take a few more mercs off your hands!
|
|
TomK
Member
Senior Forumite
Posts: 2,377
|
Post by TomK on May 4, 2011 6:16:37 GMT
This is where I totally agree with you. we'll get there. we will. not sure when but we will.
gotta realize there's a lot of growing going on here half of our business is brand new rookies and the other half is a seasoned vetran who's taken a beating and is working through the re-adjustment to climb back to the top. and somehow these rookies and the old vet have to find a way to work in harmony. don't worry, we got a good handle on it, I'm just saying there's still plenty of road before us.
|
|
|
Post by Cold Napalm on May 4, 2011 6:53:07 GMT
Not even close on my end. You've seen me when I get mad...still in fairly polite mode (for me).
Glad to hear it was useful.
Well I know gus knows these issues since people like shootermike has let it be known to him years back. What is kinda frustrating as a consumer is to see him still continue with these issues along the line. It's like watching the death of the american auto industry...yeah they knew they had issues, but they just would not take of what was known to be issues until they went belly up and the government bailed them out. You can say you know there is a problem all you want, but until you actually DO something about it, it means nothing.
Also I support what your doing with your buisness. Having the merc line with the lower finish is great...which is why I have suggestions that can be done to make that line better without any increase in price. Yeah the idea of higher lines with better handle core designs, fancier fittings and what not is fine...but I would much rather see your core line get stronger before tacking these other lines.
|
|
|
Post by Nathan Robinson on May 4, 2011 8:04:32 GMT
Ding ding ding. You got it. This is absolutely 100% accurate.
No business controls their brand or image. A business can only hope to influence it. The debate and argument with customers and their perception of the products is not only counterproductive, it has the potential to cast a negative shadow onto the products themselves. I've been around for a long time, and I'll say that it's even got me a bit concerned.
Truth be told, the lack of accountability by the vendor as to how this topic has gone is fairly offensive to me.
That's a big pet peeve of mine, too. It seems very irrational.
It's a good thing having choices, huh?
The diversity of offerings that Angus Trim swords have provided has added quite a bit to the market landscape. We have options that range from bare-bones "performance" (I hate that term) offerings, to customized "aesthetically-pleasing" (I really hate this term) offerings, to factory-made swords based on Gus's designs, to ATrim blades mounted on fully-custom hilts, etc. etc. Even within Gus's carved-out niche, he's got quite a lot of touch-points to the industry as a whole.
Now if he could just align himself with an effective marketing and distribution side of the house, he'd be solid.
|
|
Lunaman
Senior Forumite
Posts: 3,974
|
Post by Lunaman on May 4, 2011 10:32:47 GMT
+2 karma to Nathan for saying what I was thinking at every stage of this thread, and for saying it better than I could have.
|
|
|
Post by Kilted Cossack on May 4, 2011 15:38:18 GMT
My impression of Angus Trim swords? Glad you asked.
I associate Angus Trim with Western European medieval swords, cut from high quality steel, magnificently heat treated, with blades that are designed with attention to details of distal taper, profile taper, and blade geometry. My perception is that the finish will be slightly coarse, and that the fittings are designed far more for proper weight than for aesthetics. They are well made and well fitted, but fairly plain and there is no great variety in the pommels or guards. Similarly, to my untrained eye the grips seem to be fairly uniform throughout the range, and I believe I have read that Gus regards grips (both the wood and the leather) as very secondary to his main interest.
Those, then, are my impressions. Now the color commentary! None of the critiques I advanced earlier sour me on Gus Trim swords. If swords can be associated with a personality, Angus Trim swords seem to me to be the kind that a "cagey veteran" would choose, maybe not a knight but a man-at-arms, the kind who today would be a senior NCO. Nothing flashy, all business.
If wishes were horses, and beggars did ride, what would I like to see from T&TA and Gus Trim swords?
Perhaps simplest, I'd like to see the swords offered either without grips or, as Mike Harris indicated above, with only an unshaped wood block for a grip. I'm a firm believer that "doing for yourself" is a positive in and of itself, and I bet most people who buy an Atrim could put together a nice grip, suited to their tastes. (If I can do it, I figure anyone can.)
More problematic, I'd like to see a greater variety of fittings offered. Based on this thread, my perception is that Gus Trim isn't especially interested in doing this himself. Perhaps a collaboration with a cutler could be arranged? I know that there are people here on the forum who have the eye and the metal working skills to produce pommels and guards, and so long as the weights were correct I don't think there'd be a problem. (Of course, I could be overlooking subtleties.) Purely as an example, I know John Graybeard is investigating producing properly weighted pommels and guards of brass for the H/T line. Whether at that level, or a collaboration with Sonny Suttles along the lines of the Chimera swords, either could be a solution.
Further, I'd like to see bare blades offered. Some of my favorite modern swords of all time have been collaborations between Angus Trim and custom vendors like Phoenix Metal Creations and E. B. Erickson, simply gorgeous compound hilts fitted with simply fabulous Atrim blades. I fitted a Valiant AT303 blade to a Hanwei compound hilt and was tickled pink with the results. If it was possible to buy, say, an AT backsword blade (with a note such as "hilt should weigh 17 ounces total, 7 ounces of guard and ten ounces of pommel"), I'd be all over it.
Finally, I'd really like to see a scabbard/sheath option.
In recapitulation, then. I regard Angus Trim swords as well designed and well made from quality materials, albeit fairly plain. I have tremendous respect for the Atrim swords, although I only own one (and it's an older one). I'm tremendously excited by T&TA, and hope, like the old song says, the future's so bright we gotta wear shades.
|
|
|
Post by Cold Napalm on May 5, 2011 20:51:24 GMT
Or he can take the advice I said and instead of the type 6, use type 1 guards with a splash of other types. Over 20 of the albion next gens use the type 1 guard...and yet I doubt that people would say that the next gen fitting were not varied. That is because we glance over the type 1 guards and when something else is used it pop out. When you do mostly type 6 and then use other types every once in a while, those other guards gets muted. That is because the type 1 is a "subtle" guard in that it does not stick out in one's mind. The type 6 is not. So no, gus doesn't even have to religate the fitting to somebody else (which will increase cost)...he just has to be a bit smarter with what fitting he puts on what sword.
|
|
|
Post by Neil G. on May 6, 2011 14:15:57 GMT
I should preface this by saying that I do not actually own any ATrims. My impression based on what I've seen of ATrims is as follows:
They are everything you want in a sword... performance wise. They handle great, cut well, and are as tough as you could hope for. But they do lack a certain variety and visual appeal. There are a few exceptions - the XIIa.4 looks beautiful to me and the recent multi-fullered versions are attractive in their own way, but majority of classic ATrim swords to my eyes just don't look very appealing or particularly historical.
I don't know if it's feasible, but ideally what I would like to see is something similar to what Christian Fletcher had with his "build a sword" type thing - mostly because I kind of get lost in various sword ID#s and whatnot and often times I see blades that I like but fittings that I don't and short of sending it to the CSS or something or slaving over it myself I don't have much option. That way I could use an ATrim blade combined with my choice of fittings to give it the look that I like. Yes, I know that certain fittings might not be a perfect fit for certain blades due to weight, and balance issues from a performance standpoint but that is something I'd be willing to live with - maybe you could include Gus' recommendations based on the blade selected as in "You've selected a heavy XIIa blade, Gus recommends a style 1 cross, ______ handle and a type J pommel". You could even have your "munitions, mercenary, tried and true" production grades each with a different cost associated with them... and then offer the final product threaded or peened.
|
|
|
Post by Elheru Aran on May 6, 2011 15:10:58 GMT
I don't think anybody can honestly argue that Atrims aren't GOOD swords. They are very good swords indeed.
The biggest problem with them? Everybody does seem to agree that they're plain. Is that a problem after you've bought them? Not if you're willing and/or can afford to customize them. That, I think, is the biggest issue with their aesthetics-- customers want a little more variety out of the box, rather than having to take care of it themselves.
The blade forms aren't an issue; the blades are all pretty nice. No, they aren't finished quite like other high quality swords, but that doesn't really matter too much-- they're great cutters, thrusters, whatever; Gus knows what he's doing, and I've *never* seen a review where the author had a problem with the blade.
What that leaves, is that Gus tends to put your basic round-looking pommel and your basic straight guard on his swords. Yes, someone who's handled a lot will be able to tell the various differences and appreciate them aesthetically, especially when you have the swords in front of you to look at. However, to most people, a type J isn't all that different from a type K, a type H isn't all that different from a G, a style 1 guard is similar to a style 3, etc... it has to be admitted that there are some types which it's a little hard to tell apart without experienced knowledge.
How could he solve this issue? Perhaps by hiring someone else to make a different variety of pommels-- say a brazil-nut, type V1, scent-stopper, whatever. Or, an arrangement could be worked out with Sonny; whatever. The idea that a few people are putting forth about him suggesting what weight of guard and pommel would be most suitable for a blade makes sense to me.
TL;DR: Gus Trim swords are good. They're kinda plain as they come from him out of the box. People would like more variety in fittings. There are various solutions for this issue; only thing left to do is decide which, if any. It's ultimately up to him.
|
|
|
Post by Deepbluedave on May 10, 2011 12:14:21 GMT
I have wanted an Atrim Sword for about 5 years now, I have read countless reviews of how good they are and yet I have only recently just bought one, because to me they have always been lacking something visually. I want a sword to be more than just a great blade it has to appeal to me on all levels and that includes how it looks. Recently Tried and True have been giving A Trims a lot of exposure here at SBG so with my long time interest I decide to buy one. Now with all respect to Gus as a Swordmaker, the Sword I bought was a second hand Rehilted Christian Fletcher Blade. For the price I could have bought a New one, but I bought the sword that appealed to me the most overall even though it was more expensive. I hope Gus along with Tried and True can continue making these improvements to what most agree are exception blades, hopefully next time I buy an Atrim Sword it will be from the man who made it.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Tre on May 11, 2011 4:00:16 GMT
i love to look at photos of Gus's work, and DROOL.... if only i had that kind of money to get a mere 10-15 of his swords.
|
|