|
Post by sicheah on Apr 16, 2009 5:30:31 GMT
Given that most of the sword forum I had visited place greater emphasis on katana. I was thinking of starting a thread to inform most readers about Chinese swords. Personally my knowledge on Chinese sword is also very limited and I have to rely on Wikipedia for some information. I am sure some of the info in Wikipedia may be inaccurate but it does provide a comprehensive description on each Chinese sword. Below is the link: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_swordFeel free to post other links regarding Chinese swords (I am sure there are plenty out there).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2009 17:42:05 GMT
I am new to this forum. However I am not new to swords. I am so happy to see someone who is lacking in knowledge of chinese swords, yet is willing to admit it. So many people try to appear to have knowledge, yet actually are totally uninformed. As soon as I get the hang of this forum, I will be starting a thread on true knowledge of the Gim/ Jian.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2009 18:33:25 GMT
Good to see that I'm not the only one who wants more info on chinese swords instead of (boring) katanas. ;D I find this site very helpful and informative but I do not know how accurate the information is, so take it with a little caution: www.northernwu.com/Swordgrp.htm
|
|
|
Post by sicheah on May 10, 2009 23:18:00 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2009 12:29:55 GMT
I will be starting a thread on true knowledge of the Gim/ Jian. Any what exactly to you consider "True" knowledge of the Gim/Jian and what makes it any more "true" than any of the sword arts that most here study?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2009 3:36:49 GMT
Call Scott Rodell at Seven Stars Trading and/or visit his forum at Great River Taoist Center.
Another option is to search the archived material on Chinese Swords on Sword forum where Scott Rodell used to post a LOT of info.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2009 4:35:46 GMT
Any what exactly to you consider "True" knowledge of the Gim/Jian and what makes it any more "true" than any of the sword arts that most here study? I believe he is referring to how many view jian/gim as tai chi swords used mainly for exercise rather than for actual battle, whereas they aren't the whippy tai chi swords we know today, they were every bit as battle ready as the swords of most other cultures, I don't think he was putting down other sword arts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2009 8:31:30 GMT
That was my understanding also, but given the tone of the post I was replying to I had to comment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2009 14:12:49 GMT
I believe he is referring to how many view jian/gim as tai chi swords used mainly for exercise rather than for actual battle, whereas they aren't the whippy tai chi swords we know today, they were every bit as battle ready as the swords of most other cultures, I don't think he was putting down other sword arts. omegapirate2000
you are absolutely correct!!! each sword style has its purpose and beauty of its form. What is so misunderstood is the same about Chinese straight sword known as jian. WUshu swords are flimsy practice swords that the Chinese republic incorporated into the national exhibit art of wushu... real wushu is combative, but not what we know as wushu today. Chinese government squashed the true chinese martial aps after the boxer rebellion. This was too prevent uprising. after the communist revolution, it was even more so. a true gim or jian is everybit combat ready. gim and jian are not terms used to describe the difference of being combat sword or or scholar's sword as Cold Steel allegates. The termes are indigenous to the languages of north and south China, respectively. China has Cantonese, and two other main languages. Cantonese is what we most commonly recognize as chinese. I am currently teaching a class on chinese martial arts, and part of the curriculum covers chinese history and martial arts thereof. If you are interested, when I get everything going real good, I will post link to myspace for my class. I think you, omegapirate2000, will find it interesting. Most people simple believe that japanese swords and martial arts are the best. Every country has its own martial arts. Martial arts only means the study of the art of battle. Oh and remember both karate and japanes swords originated in China, and that due to historical governmental conditions and tradition, chinese cultural exchange has been shrouded in secrecy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2009 19:52:02 GMT
Actually my own reference to Jian as the Aristocrat or Scholar's sword was in comparison to the dao not to imply that either blade was not fit for combat. Modern Wushu weapons are exactly that MODERN Wushu weapons, and not fit to grace a classical battlefield.
Sirtre, you are correct every country has their own martial art, therefore when someone claims to know the absolute "truth" about martial practice, it is normally a statement best taken with a small Siberian salt mine. Hence why I took your original statement with said grain of salt.
Even in the realm of Chinese Martial Practice there is a great range of variation from the Various types of external Gong Fu, to the internal arts of Taijiquan, Hsing-I, and Bagua. Even within Taiji there is a remarkable difference between the schools, some of which do eschew the Wushu blades in favor of more traditional blades.
On another note, I knew Gim was the Cantonese term for a straight sword, but wasn't Jian derived from the Mandarian? I thought I remembered hearing that somewhere but am not certain.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2009 9:49:18 GMT
I believe he is referring to how many view jian/gim as tai chi swords used mainly for exercise rather than for actual battle, whereas they aren't the whippy tai chi swords we know today, they were every bit as battle ready as the swords of most other cultures, I don't think he was putting down other sword arts. omegapirate2000you are absolutely correct!!! each sword style has its purpose and beauty of its form. What is so misunderstood is the same about Chinese straight sword known as jian. WUshu swords are flimsy practice swords that the Chinese republic incorporated into the national exhibit art of wushu... real wushu is combative, but not what we know as wushu today. Chinese government squashed the true chinese martial aps after the boxer rebellion. This was too prevent uprising. after the communist revolution, it was even more so. a true gim or jian is everybit combat ready. gim and jian are not terms used to describe the difference of being combat sword or or scholar's sword as Cold Steel allegates. The termes are indigenous to the languages of north and south China, respectively. China has Cantonese, and two other main languages. Cantonese is what we most commonly recognize as chinese. I am currently teaching a class on chinese martial arts, and part of the curriculum covers chinese history and martial arts thereof. If you are interested, when I get everything going real good, I will post link to myspace for my class. I think you, omegapirate2000, will find it interesting. Most people simple believe that japanese swords and martial arts are the best. Every country has its own martial arts. Martial arts only means the study of the art of battle. Oh and remember both karate and japanes swords originated in China, and that due to historical governmental conditions and tradition, chinese cultural exchange has been shrouded in secrecy. With all due respect, but your statements sound very over-confident, much too much generalized, be it concerning Chinese swords or culture and language. You are not the 1st person ever to study stuff like this, and to make Cantonese so important is just not right. Having been in Hongkong lately (and hr from my home in Taiwan), they complain that Cantonese and English go down the drain, as Mandarin is omni-present. And, of course, lots of traditional schools work with real sharp weapons, do you only know Wushu clubs?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2009 5:04:53 GMT
With all due respect, but your statements sound very over-confident, much too much generalized, be it concerning Chinese swords or culture and language. You are not the 1st person ever to study stuff like this, and to make Cantonese so important is just not right. Having been in Hongkong lately (and hr from my home in Taiwan), they complain that Cantonese and English go down the drain, as Mandarin is omni-present. And, of course, lots of traditional schools work with real sharp weapons, do you only know Wushu clubs? taiwandeutscher
China is way larger than just Taiwan, or Hong Kong alone. Ancient China was a very large empire. Should we be angry for not mentioning the Mongolians, Singapore, etc. No one here is an expert of an exhaustive nature. I have been in Singapore. My teacher has lived in Hong Kong and the text that I am fixing to quote is from a book that we use for curriculum in our martial arts class. As for studying "wushu", no. Todays wushu is a government controlled performance art.
TAIJIQUAN; TWO-FOLD PURPOSE
Tai Chi Chuan has two main purposes... the original motivation behind tai chi is two-fold; self-defense, and meditaton.
To learn tai chi you must practice it in a slow-moton, relaxed mediation. Trough doing your form this way you will calm your mind and circulate oxygen throughout your body, better than you ever have. When you do this you will find yourself more effective in every aspect of your life. When you breathe and concentrate without out a cluttered mind, you will be able to think clear and perform any task at a peak level.
The root of tai chi a martial art. Martial root and the relationship with qigong have been more or less lost in today’s society. This is due the suppression of the martial aspect during the communist revolution. The suppression began with the Boxer Rebellion in the beginning of the 1900's. Chinese traditionalist used martial skills and attacked the foreigners located in China. They did not want them, nor their teachings, influencing their way of life. During the Communist Revolution, the government didn’t want these skills used against them. Subsequently, the old masters were done away with. China wanted a martial arts skill to be in the olympics and founded wushu as the national art. Wushu became a performance art, not a martial art, losing the essence of the wholeness.
The word for “martial” in chinese is wu. It is constructed of two chinese words... zhi, meaning to stop, cease, or end... and the word ge, which is for general weapons. From this you can see that it is to stop the use of weapons. The common word today for martial arts is wuyi. In actual combat, individual figting techniques are called “wushu” which means martial technique. The implication of these words together is that martial arts are to stop a fight, not start one.... defense, rather than offense. Westerners today have a concept that the name of chinese martial arts is kung fu. Kung is energy, and fu is time. Kung fu implies the time and energy one spends in learning a skill.this tem was popularized in the 1960's movies. “Your kung fu is good” was a common phrase, but meant that “your skill is good”. Westerners adopted the term kung fu to mean chinese martial arts.
The correlation between self defense skills and moving meditation for health, are interlocking. You cannot have one without the other. If you don’t have health, you cannot defend yourself. If you don’t defend yourself, you obviously will not be healthy all broken up. As you will be learning from here on out, moving meditation techniques used to bring health, also have a martial application. You will be learning about yin, and yang. This concerns opposites; the empty, and the full; the positive, and the negative, the dark, and the light; the hard, and the soft. You will find this teaching concerning martial arts is contrary to everything that you have been taught. Stances, breathing, and movements will all be absorbed in this notion. As complicated as it will appear at first, you will find it most simple.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2009 5:09:25 GMT
by the way the book was written by Dr. Yang, Jwing-Ming. This author is is master of taijijuan. He has published many books on the subjects of tai chi, chi kung, including combat aps.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2009 5:15:51 GMT
p.s. maybe i should have mentioned rgarding language of cantonese being popularized here. I currently live in USA. I forget sometimes that this is international forum, and things are not the same everywhere. They are teaching cantonese at a university near my home and i will be enrolling next year, as my language skills are distinctly lacking in that area. We have quite a few Chinese living around her. some do not speak english well, and being in EMS, it would be most valuable to learn.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2009 14:02:26 GMT
Okay, thank you for the quote from Dr. Yang Jwing-Ming as he is a respected Taijiquan master teaching modified Yang style, and the YMAA is a respected association among taijiquan players. However, that is just one of the styles of taijiquan. Another example might be the simplified taiji of Professor Cheng Man-Ch'ing (Zheng Manquing) which was created expressly for the Sino-Japanese war. The Yang family also has put new emphasis on martial application, for there accredited schools. Then there are other masters like Chen Zenglei and Jesse Tsao who also emphasize martial application. It is when you get into Taoist Taiji and some of the Wushu schools that you start losing the martial application.
Not to argue with you, but you may want to search a wider range of materials when speaking of taijiquan.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2009 14:49:10 GMT
With respect Sirtre, your comments in this thread are very arrogant, the comment;
Your "true" knowledge is subjective and probably only another aspect of the accumulated knowledge. When we start learning martial arts, especially something like taiji or kung fu (yin and yang, two sides of the same coin, internal and external is that we cultivate respect and humility.
Having said that, before there was kung fu or wushu there was martial arts, there are records 7,000 years old . Now you make the comment that wushu is a sport designed by the government. Sorry, again I am going to disagree. There is archaeological evidence that shows that during times of peace these men who practiced these arts did martial dances based on the movements of the arts.
During the metal age during the Hsia and Shang dynasties chinese martial arts was known as quanyong and shoupo. These evolved into philosophies such as bagua, yin yang and wu zing.
Swordsmanship was taken up by many scholars and were often performed as dances.
After this kung fu became institutionalised, it was only after the inception of Shaolin Kung Fu that names were used to distinguish different styles and schools. The Ming period saw even more schools of Kung Fu popping up. Kung Fu as we know it started in Shaolin Kung Fu. The taiji styles founded by the Song Emperor also came from Shaolin Kung Fu. These styles were originally only practiced in the military and then diffused to the public.
Kung fu and taiji come from these schools and they are both apart of each other, that when used together strengthen each other.
I will reflect Boyle's comments that you might want to do more research.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2009 23:47:09 GMT
LPBoyle thank you for the alternate resource. however the book quoted is only one text used. our style has taijiquan and wing tsun mixed. very interesting. later i will shoot a vid to you. oh by the way, i cant remember for sure, but if you were one of the recommenders of jin-shi, thanks. i should have my production jian here in about a week... ANTICIPATIONIS DRIVING ME NUTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2009 0:07:38 GMT
Your "true" knowledge is subjective and probably only another aspect of the accumulated knowledge. When we start learning martial arts, especially something like taiji or kung fu (yin and yang, two sides of the same coin, internal and external is that we cultivate respect and humility.
Having said that, before there was kung fu or wushu there was martial arts, there are records 7,000 years old . Now you make the comment that wushu is a sport designed by the government. Sorry, again I am going to disagree. There is archaeological evidence that shows that during times of peace these men who practiced these arts did martial dances based on the movements of the arts.
During the metal age during the Hsia and Shang dynasties chinese martial arts was known as quanyong and shoupo. These evolved into philosophies such as bagua, yin yang and wu zing.
Swordsmanship was taken up by many scholars and were often performed as dances.
After this kung fu became institutionalised, it was only after the inception of Shaolin Kung Fu that names were used to distinguish different styles and schools. The Ming period saw even more schools of Kung Fu popping up. Kung Fu as we know it started in Shaolin Kung Fu. The taiji styles founded by the Song Emperor also came from Shaolin Kung Fu. These styles were originally only practiced in the military and then diffused to the public.
Kung fu and taiji come from these schools and they are both apart of each other, that when used together strengthen each other.
I will reflect Boyle's comments that you might want to do more research. bloodwraith
IN TRUE LEARNING, ONE MUST FIRST LEARN THAT HE WILL NEVER CEASE LEARNING. however, the statement regarding the knowledge of jian is directed at the unlearned statements i have been reading that draw the conclusion that a jian is of no practical use for defense. the assumption that only a katana, or the such is the ultimate combat weapon. all sword style and martial arts styles have their beauty of performance and deadliness of use. and even in the end the one who has mastered the best of skills can be defeated by blind luck. we practice, not to fight, but to find peace. regarding your statement that i made a mistake about wushu... i quoted a knowledgeable master in taiwan. the quote was directed toward "mpdern versions of wushu." note the quote whereas stated the term wush means martial skills. i am not here to try to show that i know so much, i just want to remind some individuals that assume that they do, that we all will never stop learning.
concerning swords, you are right about the dance like moves... the are terrific for peaceful meditation. i enjoy it very much, to watch and am continuing in my learning to perform...
the statement that you are all looking at and quoting from me was directed toward an individual who scoffed to me that i must only study performance style wushu. before you take something personal, read the quotes. i dont lnow yet how to quote block as you do, so i copy and paste.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2009 5:00:40 GMT
LPBoyle
i followed the link that you sent me on yang family tai chi. the info found on site reads very much the same as Dr. Yang, Jwing-Ming's books. however the site is limited in articles for obvious reason of a man has to make his money selling the rest... what i was wondering is what is your source for the statement regarding the difference in teaching by Dr. Yang, Jwing-Ming and the ymaa, and the yang family?
thank you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2009 6:59:52 GMT
Sirtre: the way you quote blocks of text is like this [ quote ]text here that you want to quote[/ quote ] of course without the spaces. Also if you wish to add additional information to your posts, instead of double or triple posting there is an edit button in your post at the top right.
I didn't actually take anything personally, I was just trying to add more information to this conversation which is exactly what this forum is here for, for like minds with knowledge that others may or may not have to share and make a database of knowledge that will aid others in understanding.
I also apologise if you read an unfriendly tone in my posts because that is simply not true, this text based medium can be very difficult to understand the tone of what someone is trying to say.
|
|