Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2007 2:33:16 GMT
swords were also not a normal mans weapon and you'd be far more likely to find yourself facing a man with a spear or axe than a sword. Swords are hard to use and hard to make. I also have to agree.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2007 19:25:24 GMT
I have to comment on this thread for sure! While it's correct that there are no treatises, manuscripts, or anything of that sort regarding combat during the Viking Age, one can certainly be safe in saying that it wasn't much different from any other time period. Given the weaponry used in the Viking period, one has but to handle them to find what they can do (and how to do it). Their swords were hacking and slashing weapons, while the shorter seax was more of a single edged but pointy thruster, yet still a good 'dropped point' hacker. And the axe and spear are two basic weapons that you would've known how to use from childhood (no matter what), given you were a freeman. I've done SCA combat, and it is NOTHING like my impression of what Viking "style" combat was. SCA is too static and too rigid. The Norsemen were anything but....besides, I've yet to see an SCA'er do any kind of Viking combat. You know, they (Vikings) didn't wear plate right? Enough talk about it, here's what I offer as my experience..... www.youtube.com/profile?user=skallagrimm
|
|
|
Post by rammstein on Oct 4, 2007 0:59:37 GMT
That's phenominal, mate...
karma for you.
|
|
|
Post by randomnobody on Oct 4, 2007 1:21:31 GMT
A latecomer to this thread, and only a quick skim through, I have to say, those videos look like fun. Shame I don't have time to watch them all right now, but I'll definitely be back for more when I can spare a moment or two.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2007 5:06:45 GMT
I've done SCA combat, and it is NOTHING like my impression of what Viking "style" combat was. SCA is too static and too rigid. The Norsemen were anything but....besides, I've yet to see an SCA'er do any kind of Viking combat. You know, they (Vikings) didn't wear plate right? If you have done SCA combat then you should know that we are all considered to be wearing a mail hauberk and an open face headcap, regardless of what we are actually wearing. Hits to the top of the helmet don't count. Head-shots have to be on the face-grill or below the Earline. People can wear plate if they like, but they have to take hits as if they are wearing mail. That way we are all on the same level. The style of fighting will be primarily dictated by the armor and weapons used. Viking did not wear plate. The mail or leather armor they wore was not sword-proof. It may have offered some resistance, but they had to block any incoming blows with their shield or weapon to be on the safe side. It is on that basis that I say that SCA fighting would resemble viking fighting. As far as too static? That is a personal choice. I have fought people that I have to chase all over the place. Some people prefer to conserve energy. Others like to dart in and out of range. Some people like to keep their weapons in motion to maintain momentum. Different sections of the country tend to favor different styles. Northeast is know for using large shields. WestCoast uses small shields and bucklers. Midwest does a lot of two-weapon forms. If you have only trained at a small local practice you will only see one style of fighting. If you go to large regional events like Pennsic, Gulf Wars, Estrella... you will see a wide variety of styles including Asian and African. Longaxe, I took a look at the Vid you posted. The formation of the too sides seems accurate. Not much different then formations I have seen some households use in the SCA at Wars. On an individual basis, it seems non-competitive. I see people throwing their blades right in the middle of other peoples shields. I could not see everybody, but one person that clearly stood out was a big guy at the end. He appeared to be trying to slice into peoples mail at one point. I saw his arm flailing out very wide during a few cuts he attempted. That is inefficient and an invitation to get it hacked. I also saw a lot of people squareing off and exposing their swordside. This is very basic stuff. But the thing that is obvious is that you can see the blade move through the air. If you look at any SCA vid, you will not be able to see the blade move despite the fact that it is thicker then a steel blade because it is moving at about 200 mph through the air. Just look at the vids the guys cutting the water bottles and compare that to the speed of the strikes these guys are making. A sword is not a lightsaber. If it is to do any damage it must strike with great speed. To generate that speed, you have to use proper body mechanics and that is lacking. Learning it takes years of training and I still consider myself a beginner. I can tell that this demo is not intended to demonstrate individual fighting tactics but rather group tactics. It is not my intention to insult you, so please take no offense. This is a good demo of group fighting tactics, but not of individual tactics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2007 2:19:12 GMT
Tsafa: forgive me if i am wrong bu the SCA don't use live steel do they? I thought they used pvc wrapped in gaffa tape or the equivalent of? I'm not sure you actually understand that these kinds of fights have to be done in such a way that your opponent can see the strike coming so they can block it? The reason for this is safety, from what you have said about imagining the person is wearing mail and hitting the face grill for it to be an effective hit, again you aren't using live steel are you? With the group i am involved with we aren't allowed to use horizontal strike against the side of the helmet because it is far to dangerous, we are using live steel however, everything from two handed axes to quarterstaves. Also the helmets we use are not the kind with face grills and whatever they are historic period specific some don't even have face grills. So yes it may look ineffective but you have to move at about half speed for many safety reasons when doing live steel combat. Our members also wear gambesons and sometimes a mail shirt, but usually the gambe is protection enough. There is a big difference between live steel combat and SCA combat, i mean i have seen SCA guys wielding what they have determined to be a two handed axe with all the weight of a feather. If you swung a real two handed axe like that you would probably hurt yourself not to mention kill your opponent. You can't go at full speed with live steel because mistakes happen and as it is even at the speed at which our group goes there are still accidents and injuries.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2007 18:48:09 GMT
Understood completely Bloodwraith, regarding safety issues. I only made the points I made because Longaxe seemed to imply that the demo he presented was an accurate representation of Viking combat... and there is no such thing. There is a give and take between safety and realism.
I do Livesteel outside the SCA. I am also a member of the MSR. I posted a vid a few weeks ago called MSR LiveSteel. The rules are similar to what you said in that all strikes must be wound-up and telegraphed. We do horizotal and vertical strikes, No diagonal. No pumps, NO fakes and NO low-rising shots. For the most part we are aiming at the other persons weapon or shield. This really looks cool to people watching. The blades move slower so people can see them, just like in the movies. However it is non-competitive. You can not use these skills in combat but you get to swing a real steel sword.
/index.cgi?board=wma&action=display&thread=1189462493
Just to correct a few things you said about the SCA weapons. The weapons we use are rattan-wood. Which is similar to bamboo but solid. With the basket hilts my 37" weights 2lbs 15oz. That is balanced exactly like my Windless Classic Medieval. My 31" weighs 2 lbs 15oz and is balanced exactly like my Hanwai Practical Knightly. The wood is thinker to make up for the shorter length. My axe has a solid rubber head. 9" length by 8" depth. 1" thick. I have a 22" handle on it and also use it with a basket hilt. It weights 3 lbs 10 oz and hits like a ton of bricks. The basket hilt makes it a bit heavier then a real axe would be but I am comfortable with it. The short handle allows me to control it, roll it and change direction. The additional weight is offset by the fact that I don't need to wear a gauntlet.
People are able to manipulate the size, weight and balance of their weapons through a variety of means. I use steel basket hilts but some people use plastic or aluminum to make them lighter. Others screw washers to the base to act as pommols. Others put more tape near the tips to make them more blade heavy.
I think you may be confusing SCA with LARP. They use padded PVC. In the SCA we hit so hard that we get bruises through our armor. That kind of force can only be generated with good body mechanics and proper edge allignment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2007 2:44:49 GMT
On the subject of Ireland and the Vikings... ;D Ah, ah, We come from the land of the ice and snow, from the midnight sun where the hot springs blow. The hammer of the gods Will drive our ships to new lands, To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming! On we sweep with threshing oar, Our only goal will be the western shore. Ah, ah, We come from the land of the ice and snow, from the midnight sun where the hot springs blow. How soft your fields so green, Can whisper tales of gore, Of how we calmed the tides of war. We are your overlords. On we sweep with threshing oar, Our only goal will be the western shore. So now youd better stop and rebuild all your ruins, For peace and trust can win the day Despite of all your losing. Immigrant's Song- Led Zepplin
|
|
|
Post by ShooterMike on Oct 9, 2007 3:19:04 GMT
I've heard that song a thousand times, but never caught the words. WOW! How cool is that?! Thanks for posting this!  ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2007 5:34:16 GMT
I never realized that song was about Vikings. I think the reference to Valhala makes it a definate.
|
|
|
Post by rammstein on Oct 9, 2007 10:19:33 GMT
Wow, slow old people. This music was from YOUR time period! Sad that we young people know it better....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2007 19:44:00 GMT
Any new grey hairs to report, Mike? Ramm and I are going to take this opportunity to rub in the fact that you're old and we're not. I will concede that 'old' music is pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by rammstein on Oct 9, 2007 20:01:13 GMT
It's not "old" music. It was music placed into a socially incorrect time period. God originally planned 60's and 70's music to be introduced all at once on september 22nd, 2007, but he was afraid of how many exploding frontal lobes it would induce in the population. So he and I argued back in forth and he made the rather presumptuous suggestion that it would be better if placed here. Him being god and all, I couldn't really argue. But I still think he made a grave mistake showing this music to those who can't appreciate it like you all's.
Zing!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2007 20:25:24 GMT
Ehh, Zepplin's alright. I just think their a little too......(gotta pick my words carefully!) ordinary. Standard. White Bread. For me anyway. Their sound has been reused so many times that I sometimes can't tell the difference.
|
|
|
Post by rammstein on Oct 9, 2007 20:27:41 GMT
Really?
Well I hope you know that they've been copied because they're so great and not because they themselves are bad...
Anyways I find their music staggeringly original to the point of it almost being absurd. Listen to "Since I've Been Loving You" or "Babe, I'm Gonna Leave You." Some of their best.
edit: Ahh what do you know! You like Dropkick murphys! *makes retching sound.* Anywho, they just had a huge concert down hear in north cuba....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2007 20:40:35 GMT
My musical tastes range very widely. I'm surprised you even remembered what I liked. The dropkick Murphy's are okay, which is my descriptor of choice for music that I'm not completely fanatical about. Those bands I posted so long ago were just the tip of the iceberg in terms of my taste. I tend to tread the murky waters of indie rock and unheard of bands, which was why I listed some better known ones. Liking what I do has it's downsides of course. Every time someone asks me what kind of music I like, I list of string of bands I love very deeply. They stare at me with a blank look, and I die a little inside. Led Zeppelin gets points for originality, that's true. But I liked Zappa and Jethro Tull better. 
|
|
|
Post by rammstein on Oct 9, 2007 21:00:30 GMT
Led Zeppelin gets points for originality, that's true. But I liked Zappa and Jethro Tull better.  Understandable 
|
|