Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2010 10:45:42 GMT
I am shopping for my first sword. I've done about 10 hours of research and learned quite a bit (thanks a lot to this site) and I believe I have narrowed down my choice to this one www.kultofathena.com/product.asp?item=SH2349&name=Hanwei+Tang+Jian The biggest problem I had in shopping for a sword was trying to figure out the action of the blade. The action I'm talking about is the saw wobble, like if you were to hold the hilt and the tip of the sword and violently shake it the blade should give and not be totally stiff as a rock. I admit that I'm fond of the green destiny sword (but I want a real one vs. a fake imitation). This one seems to be the best in my price range. Plus, this will be my first and last sword ever and none of the other style swords really get my attention. So considering the tapered thickness of the carbon steel blade is 4.9 mm - 1.7 mm, and the P.O.B.: 1 3/4'', do you think this sort is flexible but not too flexible so it sounds like your fighting with a saw banging sideways against a tree? :lol: I was going to get the practical tai chi sword as it seems to be somewhat flexible as that is what I am looking for. But if the tang jian has a diamond shaped blade then wouldn't that stiffen it up some or maybe too much? The blade is distal tapered. From the pictures I can't tell that the tip half of the blade is diamond shaped. Can you? This picture is obviously a diamond shaped blade. But this one is harder to tell. Maybe a little? By the time you get to the tip it doesn't seem to be diamond shaped anymore. One other thing that confuses me is the weight. 2lbs 10oz. Doesn't that seem a bit much? Does that include the scabbard? The scabbard does have brass on it so it might give it more weight but the specs don't specify (imagine that). What are your thoughts on the weight? Smooth and consistent circular hand movements seem good but quick back and forth probably not. Too much weight. I've been lugging around a 2.5lb weight I have and it's not too bad. I plan to use the sword mostly for practicing tai chi, but I do want it battle ready (sharpened) too. I figure if its sharp then I'll just respect it more when I'm using it vs. just being careless so I don't go removing my foot. So based on what I've written do you think this is a sword I would like blade-wise? That's my main concern. I suppose if anything I could return it if it doesn't suit me but it would be nice to not have to do that. Thanks everyone.
|
|
|
Post by Wes on Dec 2, 2010 11:14:32 GMT
Personally I recommend having one custom made through Garrett Chan. Hanwei's jians don't have the best reputation for durability. I can't speak for these two swords in particular, but I know in general they aren't designed to be used, just to be oogled. Edit: Here's a link to some of Garrett's past commissions. s919.photobucket.com/albums/ad37 ... =slideshow
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2010 12:15:41 GMT
I can't answer as to whether or not you'd like the sword, but I can point out a couple of things. As a matter of course, when a swords weight is given it's without the scabbard, so that weight ought to be the weight of the bare sword. That does seem a trifle high but I suspect you'd get used to it quickly enough. The only real concern I have is that you state you want a sword that's "Battle Ready" and Hanwei doesn't recommend any of their jian for anything other then light cutting except the Scott Rodell designed cutting jian www.kultofathena.com/product.asp ... ting+Sword so I'm not sure if this sword is as robust as you want. I see it's heen suggested you look into Jin Shi swords, this is excellent advice from what I gather to anyone looking for a Chinese sword.
|
|
|
Post by chrisperoni on Dec 2, 2010 12:40:36 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2010 12:43:39 GMT
BWA HA HA...that's what they ALL say... :mrgreen: Welcome aboard.
|
|
|
Post by chrisperoni on Dec 2, 2010 16:20:44 GMT
Awesome catch- and so true... Uzbazbiel, You can't just have ONE sword..oh no no no. You might think one is enough but you will come to find the necessary amount of swords required is directly related to how much money you can spare
|
|
|
Post by jblakey on Dec 2, 2010 19:13:39 GMT
I've got a number of jians, and for forms practice, i prefer this one: www.kungfudirect.com/proddetail. ... =020100106 It's nicely balanced, reasonably well made, and looks pretty nice. Comes with a carry case, too! I've tried pretty much every Hanwei jian, as well as a few other makers, and I still like this one best for forms. Cutting is a different story, though. I find this issue is similar to iaito/tameshigiri practice - you wouldn't use the same sword for 1000 suburi as you would for cutting mats (or at least I don't). Thanks, jason
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 3, 2010 21:30:11 GMT
I came to a number of conclusions about the sword I want. The chances that I'm going to have a real sword fight with someone in the next year or two are probably none so the need for a 'real' combat ready sword isn't necessary. I'm on a budget so I cant' afford those $1000+ swords so that is totally out even though some of those swords are really super nice! You're probably right as this probably isn't my last sword but it will be for a year or two unless I come into a bigger income (paycheck to paycheck normally).
I read somewhere that sword weight, for a practicing martial artist, ought to be a bit heavier vs. the 'practice swords' and that a typical practitioner eventually desires a more heavy sword once they get used to the lightweight ones. And ultimately it's not really the weight but the strength of the keeper that's the best issue so the more strength you have the lighter the sword will appear to be. To sort of pretest this idea I looked up a few sword routines and used a dumbbell weight in my hand to mimick the weight of a sword to see how easy it would be to move around with. I have a 1 1/4lb and a 2 1/2lb weight. The lighter is identical to the hanwei practical sword and the heavier weight is only 2oz shy of the weight of the tang jian. At first the 2.5lb weight seemed heavy (but I'm not in that great of shape as I'm just starting taichi and the sword would be my motivation) and the 1.25lb weight felt quicker to maneuver. After playing with each weight for about 10min/weight I came to the same conclusion as the guy who wrote the article that I read. The 1.25 felt great for my out of shape self and the 2.5 felt like a challenge, but I like challenges. Ultimately, the 2.5 felt better than the 1.25 as it gave me the feel of a 'real' sword and besides, if it's more of a stabbing sword some extra inertia might do desired though I'm not entirely sure on that. This morning I picked up the 2.5 and it felt normal to me. I also noticed that the 1.25 weight had more of a jerky motion and the 2.5 had a more graceful maneuverability. I convinced myself that the heavier sword is for me especially being that I know I'm the type of person who would want a heavier sword in the end and I don't want to end up wanting another sword due to availability of funds!
I also shopped around for different prices and noticed that the kultofathena website was incorrect on the POB. It's 3 1/2" vs. the 1 3/4". So I take it this is more of an artistic wrist action sword vs. swinging sword which suits me as I'll be using this indoors plus ethically speaking I believe in more of a defense vs. offensive posture and overall it will just be more fun (so when I subdue my enemy I can carve the letter "U" in the wall must faster and get away (haha). In any case, I feel its a good intermediate sword (for me) for what I want to use it for and a year or two down the road when my investments pay off I can buy an authentic 'real' sword. When I said my first and last sword I meant one that I can use as I am not the collector type. I'm a minimalist so I don't believe in owning things that don't serve a purpose.
So I did end up purchasing Hanwei Tang Jian (today) from kultofathena. They seem to have a good rep and ethical business practice and policy and best of all PRICE ($268). Every other site wants around $320 plus. In the end if I don't really like it I'll have 45 days to return it for a full refund minus shipping. And, of course, thanks for all the input and suggestions! I'll give my input/review on the sword once I get it and have used it for a while.
Namaste!
|
|
Taran
Member
Posts: 2,621
|
Post by Taran on Dec 5, 2010 23:03:04 GMT
You will find, Uzbazbiel, that this forum is focused primarily on swords of a sub-$300 price. We take notice of the higher end pieces, but our focus is the less costly ones. Jin Shi ranges quite widely depending on what you want.
The big concern, though, is that you decide what you want to use a given sword For before looking to buy one. Forms? Cutting? Hanging on the wall? Sparring? All the swords being produced are not good for all things.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2010 6:01:34 GMT
Well, I got the Hanwei Tang Jian and am quite impressed with a few surprises. It is beautiful and feels great to hold.
1) The weight of the Jian is technically 1lb 9 1/4oz with the tassel and 1lb 7 1/3oz without the tassel. The 2lb 10oz is with the scabbard. I was surprised to discover that it is quite a bit lighter than I had originally thought.
2) The point of balance is approx 4 1/2" from the end of the leather grip. the 1 3/4" was measured from the end of the guard. That I found strange.
3) I agree that it really would not be wise to use it as a cutting sword. The blade isn't polished much and is quite thin. It's rigid but does flex quite nicely but it takes a good strong hand/wrist to make that happen. It has the perfect flexibility as far as I'm concerned. It was exactly what I was looking for. And as far as the edge it is sharp, does cut paper, but isn't so sharp that it'll slice through anything which I think is a good thing. I've I ever used it for self defense purposes I think it could stand up to a once time beating but probably without some edge damage, maybe, though I'm not sure about that.
Overall I love the sword, feel, look, weight, handling, ect. It was exactly what I was looking for. If I had more money I'd probably spend more but I think this one will do for a while. So I would recommend this to anyone who wants a great display sword or practices form or wants to have a battle against a piece of paper. I doubt anyone will have this blade fall out of the hilt or break easily so I feel safe giving it a good swing. It's much nicer in person than it is in pictures too.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Tre on Dec 10, 2010 16:30:15 GMT
i agree that the best thing for jian would be the rodell model or even better a custom from jinshi. also if you like a light quick sword that is cut worthy and would be great if zombies attack and you have to use it in battle, i would recommend the old production jinshi blade with custom modifications. it is less than 2 lb and is balanced like it is air.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2010 17:53:15 GMT
I emailed Garrett but he didn't seem interested in making a sword. I asked him how much are his swords so I know if it's in my budget and he didn't even bother to respond so foey on him.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Tre on Dec 11, 2010 1:46:19 GMT
dont be discouraged he is rather busy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2010 3:33:52 GMT
I don't know my dynasties. It just looks good to me. As far as Garrett is concerned, I don't know about him. I did tell him exactly what I was looking for and what he might be able to offer for under $300 and he never responded to that. What he did respond to was to tell me that I don't have an eye for a good sword. Basically, what I was looking for is different from what he feels is a 'real' sword because I like the flexible blades. His website is far less than informative enough to be able to determine what to order and he's less than communicative to being able to facilitate and order. I don't know exactly what he does as far as his style and he just never bothered to tell me. It's been over a week since I asked and he emailed me more than once. I can't speak of the quality of swords that he makes but as far as his business is concerned it's far less than professional.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2010 13:51:46 GMT
Hi everyone! I finally made it to the new forum. Unfortunately, not for fun and games.
I need to address this:
and this
Normally, I keep a low profile and mind my own business, but I won't have my name sullied like this as I feel it only serves to grossly misinform. Firstly, Jin Shi is not a store like KoA. My job is to provide swords to a certain segment of the market. That means I regularly do a little consulting before most orders. Some people like this, some don't. Uzbazbiel was of the latter group. I choose my customers just as they choose me.
To get to the point. Uzbazbiel, I'd like to kindly ask you not to spread unsubstantiated claims of my "malpractice", please. We've already settled our differences via email. I understand if you feel emotional about it, but let's be reasonable and objective instead of injecting personal feelings. If you persist in painting me as a villain, I'll be forced to post our entire email correspondence so people can develop their own opinion instead of reading my words taken out of context and twisted into an obvious negative slant.
P.S. I'm glad the Hanwei Tang jian worked out for you. It sounds perfect for what you had in mind.
Thanks so much, Garrett
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2010 14:14:23 GMT
Like I said, unprofessional. Now you're threatening me and projecting your untrue perception (aka slandering). You want to be reasonable yet you threaten me? What's wrong with you? I simply stated my experience as well as my opinion of my experience of you. But, go ahead, and post everything so you can prove everything I said here is true. You have bad communication skills ("My job is to provide swords to a certain segment of the market." <- website doesn't say anything about this nor have you ever told me this), your website is less than informative and your business is a joke and I wouldn't recommend anyone go to you because of your lack of professionalism. You talk down to people and you're rude. You're diplomatic like a sociopath, trying to be "kind" while attacking person you're requesting kindness from. They call that psychological abuse and no one responds positively to that so you might take a clue and learn from the experience and move on if you can't handle someone speaking of their experience with you. You've "sullied" your own name, Garrett.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2010 14:27:49 GMT
Uz,
I won't say anything to that except that I believe that I have the right to defend my name here as I believe you slandered me first. It may come off as a threat, but I think people shouldn't form an opinion based on cut out excerpts from our emails that you hold at the forefront of your mind. I am merely trying to provide the means for other people to make informed decisions. Biased misinformation = slander. The "experience" with me you are so eager to spread is incomplete. I'd like to call it quits please.
You may say my intention to paint a complete picture sociopathic and psychological abuse if you like. That doesn't change the fact that you're demonizing me.
Quick edit: Uz, I admit I can be abrasive at times and maybe you are sensitive. Can we just settle that our personalities just don't jive (at all!) and end it rather than calling me unprofessional?
|
|
|
Post by Gundoggy on Dec 12, 2010 16:12:20 GMT
Interesting Post.
Garrett has devoted his company to making swords that perform as closely to the antiques as possible. Antique swords typically are heavier, stiffer, with a more distal POB than the soft 'tai chi swords' that pass themselves off as true weapons. Garrett also consults with experts in the field like Peter Dekker, Philip Tom and Scott Rodell to try to nail down historical accuracy for his pieces. He also examines as many antiques as possible (like those in my collection) and in the past has literally spent hours measuring weigth, POB, blade dimensions and then making prototype blades to see how they play compared to the antiques. He has also reproduced antique fittings as well.
The Chinese Sword market has languished for years due to companies that really don't give a damn about historical accuracy. Even big companies like Huanuo still make flat diamond blade geometries, and even Hanwei's Rodell jian doesn't really have a clamshell profile like the antiques. Jin-shi has focused on historical accuracy. This is not cheap yet realistically is still a better deal than Huanuo. To me the Hanweil Rodell jian while a serviceable cutter, has various deficiencies.
Now not everyone may need an antique like sword. That's fine since the market is full of more affordable 'sword like objects'. They function well for forms but one MUST be careful when cutting since their tangs and handle construction may not be designed to take that tremendous impact. Also, a 'solid' looking sword blade may lack the heat treatment to have the proper resiliency to not snap when cutting. To use a 'practice sword' for such things may be very dangerous. Although I'm sure a 'practice sword' is quite capable of very limited defensive use and cutting meaning it could likely cut or stab before snapping, if you ever parry with it, it once again may not be resilient enough to take the force of the blow.
To demand a sword company to make something it's not focused or set up to produce is like going to a Harley Davidson Store and asking them to make a 'Harley Davidson' Scooter. Jin-shi makes a certain type of sword and that is it's business mandate. If it doesn't fit your needs or budget then buy from another store like you have.
|
|
|
Post by Gundoggy on Dec 12, 2010 16:17:36 GMT
Eques,
you have to be wary of using late Qing jian/gim as an example. Some of them have very thin, almost whippy, blades with UNHARDENED edges. Basically some were not designed to be functional. Looking at the historical context, by that time, swords were no longer a realistic practical weapon as well many swords were sold to people who hung them an the wall as a status symbol so they didn't need a real weapon.
Many of those swords reached blade lengths of 31-32". I have one such antique that although sharp, it is a bit too floppy for my tastes, edge is not as hard as I like (55-60 is what I love to see on antiques) and blade is almost 32" long.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2010 0:08:47 GMT
There are some of both, but generally workmanship declined in the late Qing. Very late in the game the Chinese started nickel plating their swords due to Western influence. The nickel plating sometimes hides things. Gundoggy's nickel plated jian has very soft steel with a floppy blade. You can feel it flex during dry handling.
I recently picked up one of the nickel plated variety. It had a stiffer blade. I also did a hardness test and found it to have hardened edges. I'm planning to do a full polish to see what's underneath the nickel. It's a bit like uncovering treasure. I believe that twistcore blades have been found underneath nickel before.
|
|