|
Post by jhunt7039 on Aug 30, 2024 1:01:16 GMT
Just received my first katana from cloudhammer, sx105v TH, however it came broken due to shipping I presume. Im submitting a return and when deciding if I want a different katana when I reorder after having this one in my hands I become interested in a dragon king sword.
Here is the cloudhammer: rva-katana.com/products/katana-circling-dragons-budget-sx105v?_pos=74&_sid=b01e1aba1&_ss=r
-sx105v TH
-leather ito wrap
-no horn at all on saya
-no hishigami
-brass fittings
-is the rayskin real? not sure
Here is the dragon king: rva-katana.com/products/katana-dragon-king-war-fire?_pos=3&_sid=1d6034558&_ss=r
-65mn DH real hamon
-cotton ito wrap
-real rayskin
-iron tsuba i think
-not sure what fittings are made of
-horn on the saya
My questions:
1. Noting that I am a noob when it comes to cutting, but will only be cutting things like water jugs and pool noodles, will I be at a noticeable risk of damaging the DH blade?
2. Which sword do you guys think is just of a higher quality and a better value and will last longer for the price ($375)? both the aesthetics are fine to me.
|
|
|
Post by mrstabby on Aug 30, 2024 6:58:22 GMT
Honestly I'd take the SX105V. Its only 2 HRC softer and the steel is better (Japanese therefore tighter tolerances, higher carbon and silicon). 65Mn is a bit more brittle as well, so it could definately chip with a bad bottle cut.
|
|
|
Post by crazyjons on Aug 30, 2024 15:23:30 GMT
I have the war fire katana and I like it, the ito is very tight and saya fit is nice. Hamon is not that cool looking and the balance is a bit blade heavy. I would call it a good budget starter katana.
Jon
|
|
larason2
Member
Posts: 922
Member is Online
|
Post by larason2 on Aug 31, 2024 3:03:03 GMT
There's really no substantial differences in the fittings. They're basically all made in the same factory in China of "mystery metal" and painted. That includes both tsuba, even the one that looks "iron." Synthetic samegawa (rayskin) is actually considered superior to cheap real rayskin, so the difference is probably insignificant. Personally I prefer brass fittings, because at least you know what you're getting, and they can be antiqued to look reasonably authentic. It's not uncommon to get big casting bubbles in them, but at the price you can't complain. Leather doesn't really need hishigami, it just behaves differently than cotton, silk, or whatever they make the synthetic silk out of (usually polyester or nylon I would think).
So as suggested, the most important difference between the two is the blade. Differentially hardened is still fine for cutting, but you run a higher risk of warping the blade on a bad cut, after which it needs to be straightened. Do that enough, and it will break. So for beginner cutters, through hardened is recommended. Both would be decent cutters though.
|
|