|
Post by Eric Bergeron on Sept 17, 2019 16:08:44 GMT
I was wondering if those two listed what would people lean towards for purchasing? Looking at either of those two in the near future.
|
|
|
Post by Timo Nieminen on Sept 17, 2019 20:24:16 GMT
The Hanwei. The TFW is perhaps metallurgically better. Probably harder edge, at least. But IMO the Hanwei is a better oxtail. And much cheaper.
|
|
|
Post by Eric Bergeron on Sept 17, 2019 22:20:54 GMT
The Hanwei. The TFW is perhaps metallurgically better. Probably harder edge, at least. But IMO the Hanwei is a better oxtail. And much cheaper. That's what I was thinking as well, I had one of these years ago but it was stolen and I've wanted to add it back to the collection.
|
|
pgandy
Moderator
Senior Forumite
Posts: 10,296
|
Post by pgandy on Sept 18, 2019 2:22:57 GMT
I have the Hanwei and no experience with the TFW. I dare say that the TFW may have a more robust blade but the Oxtail had an insanely sharp edge. A red silk flag came attached to my grip which got sliced several times before I removed it just by touching the edge during drills. It has held up well for over a decade and handles very well.
|
|
LeMal
Member
Posts: 1,180
|
Post by LeMal on Sept 18, 2019 6:25:21 GMT
Personally? The TFW. But then the reason I've eyed it a long time is to have it rehilted as an early Eastern, calavlry-type war sword--not for Chinese swordsmanship. And while I don't study that, just from casual observation of it I can see why the other recommendations are for the Hanwei being a far better choice.
|
|
stormmaster
Member
I like viking/migration era swords
Posts: 7,714
|
Post by stormmaster on Sept 18, 2019 7:28:23 GMT
i like the wider blade of the hanwei one better, and its cheaper
|
|
|
Post by anima on Sept 18, 2019 21:41:04 GMT
Heres my Hanwei Oxtail Dao factory edge cutting bottles!
|
|
|
Post by Eric Bergeron on Sept 19, 2019 1:53:15 GMT
Very nice Anima :)
|
|
|
Post by pellius on Sept 21, 2019 0:07:58 GMT
I have one of each. They are both really nice, well built swords with tough, high quality, and well tempered steel. Just a couple of things I would point out.
The TFW is considerably larger. I have seen some CMA practitioners complain that, while the Hanwei is a very legitimate functional sword, it may be a bit “too” small and lightweight. I never did CMA forms competitions (and typically one would not use a sharp for competition), but the general rules I have seen for US competitions require the sword be long enough to reach from palm to earlobe. The Hanwei is way shorter than that.
The blade of the Hanwei has the nice traditional oxtail profile, and features a slight lenticular/niku cross section, which is pretty nice. The blade is rigid enough for thrusting. The TFW blade is more of a type 4c+ falchion profile with a flat grind/hira zukuri cross section. It is also rigid enough for thrusting, and has a reinforced tip.
The grip and fittings of the Hanwei appear classier to me. The paracord laced wrap looks really nice, but it is somewhat slippery feeling. You can get a firm grip; it just feels a little squirrelly at first. The TFW wood grip is very attractive in person, and offers a confident grip. If only it matched the scabbard color a little better.
Imho, both handle really nicely, but differently. I like a more substantial sword, so I lean toward the TFW.
I think the TFW is the better sword, but probably not enough better to justify double the price. I think it is worth its price; it’s just not a smoking good deal like the Hanwei.
I think you would be pleased with either one. fwiw
|
|