Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2008 11:16:34 GMT
Do any of you have any experience with cut tests for Huanuo jians?
I need to buy a durable Jian for cutting practice, but I'm not really into the aesthetics of Hanweis jians (I love their daos) and I'm pretty impressed with Huanuo's look.
|
|
|
Post by lol74 on Jul 7, 2008 12:43:40 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2008 21:43:57 GMT
I would say buy a jian from Garrett when he is fully set up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2008 3:09:55 GMT
I second makadona
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2008 4:37:00 GMT
I would say buy a jian from Garrett when he is fully set up. who?
|
|
|
Post by randomnobody on Jul 8, 2008 5:05:32 GMT
I would say buy a jian from Garrett when he is fully set up. who? See here: /index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=412 And here: /index.cgi?board=chineseswords&action=display&thread=4624
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2008 0:37:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lol74 on Jul 9, 2008 1:09:04 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2008 3:25:47 GMT
Didn`t Scott Rodell test some Huanuo stuff with great satisfaction? And I personally would alwas go for a correct repro of antique swords, not some phantasy influenced modern stuff. www.grtc.org/news/index.html
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2008 7:58:42 GMT
What fantasy influenced modern stuff?!? The eight sided jian is perfectly historical as is the double fuller one for han period swords.
edit: found the cutting vid...not very impressed. He is shatterings those bamboo pieces more then cutting...which isn't that hard to do. His technique is pretty good, but the swords seem to be the problem in this case. The swords might have good weight and balance and act like the weapons of old...but either their edge is extremely dull, or their edge geomentry is off because with the way he is cutting, it should be cutting better then that if it's a good sword.
|
|
|
Post by lol74 on Jul 20, 2008 21:10:30 GMT
Didn`t Scott Rodell test some Huanuo stuff with great satisfaction? And I personally would alwas go for a correct repro of antique swords, not some phantasy influenced modern stuff. www.grtc.org/news/index.htmlseems that you need to brush up on some of your chinese sword history, the han sword is one of the more well known styles of ancient chinese sword, and having one with eight sides is extremely accurate. Also, I believe Rodell had tested several swords produced by Zheng Wu forge, and had ended up with far superior results.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2008 23:35:10 GMT
edit: found the cutting vid...not very impressed. He is shatterings those bamboo pieces more then cutting...which isn't that hard to do. His technique is pretty good, but the swords seem to be the problem in this case. The swords might have good weight and balance and act like the weapons of old...but either their edge is extremely dull, or their edge geomentry is off because with the way he is cutting, it should be cutting better then that if it's a good sword. OTOH, perhaps the bamboo was a bit dry, as was suggested by the factory manager. Just a thought.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2008 6:42:43 GMT
What fantasy influenced modern stuff?!? The eight sided jian is perfectly historical as is the double fuller one for han period swords. .... Glaciersteel: seems that you need to brush up on some of your chinese sword history, the han sword is one of the more well known styles of ancient chinese sword, and having one with eight sides is extremely accurate. Sorry, English is my 3rd language, so sometimes, my usage of words will be not standard. Please tolerate also non native speakers! ;D I should have said, that those repros are a bit inaccurate?! Too much for me, in fact. Here my points, and if wrong, please ellaborate and brush up my knowledge of Chinese swords, as I`m new on the forum. 1. Guards, handles and pommels of most Han swords had been made of natural materials, i.e. jade, wood and bone. Only few bronze guards have been found, and to replace them with high quality steel is a possibility, yes, but not a reproduction. 2. Both blades, the eight sided one and the double fuller, were typical only for bronze stuff, as this material was easy to be worked on, beeing much softer. My sources say that in later Han, also first iron/steel blades appeared, probably out of trial and error at the forge, with the first real forging process in several steps. But there were no tools to work this much harder material in the beginning. So all cross-sections of iron/steel blades (carbon of up to 5%) have the thick ridge in the middle section and thinner edged on both sides, creating 4 sides, not 8 and having no fuller. My sources are: Yang Hong, Alex Huangfu Jiang and Thomas Chen`s pics. Yours? For those reasons, I personally prefer the higher developed Song (or even later) swords, which had been made of good quality steel, so they can be reproduced with equivalent materials. And also here, I prefer hand produced steel to industrial production.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2008 8:15:10 GMT
Actually, han swords having metal fittings wouldn't be that rare. You can see that even in thomas chen's webpage. thomaschen.freewebspace.com/photo.htmlAbout han swords geometry and steel vs bronze, I don't know that subject THAT well, so maybe garret or others can field that better. But the argument you make does make sense. However even if that is the case, making those in steel form for modern use vs bronze isn't exactly a BAD thing. And who's to say that once they got over the initial transition from steel to bronze (since they were doing that in the warring states era) that they went back to the old geometry. Also huanuo, zheng wu and master zhi all are hand produced swords. They are all hand forged shops in china. In that aspect none has an advantage over the other. As for the bamboo...yes it did look like it was a bit dry...but I have seen videos of him cutting with Zheng Wu jians and daos against dry bamboo with much better results. And if their katanas can't cut those skinny little bamboo, dry or not, then I really wonder if something is being done horribly wrong. I don't have anything solid per say...but drawing the lines, I would not risk my money on huanuo swords at this time. Especially since there are other options out there...at similar or less prices.
|
|
|
Post by lol74 on Jul 21, 2008 12:33:05 GMT
I am well aware of traditional han fittings being made out of materials such as jade, but then again, today these materials have become very expensive, if one seeks a han sword with jade fittings, then Zheng Wu forge is the only one that I know of that still uses jade fittings, but those swords are their higher end models, they hover around the $1000-$2000 mark.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2008 3:21:47 GMT
Thanks for your replys, Napalm and LoL. The pic of Th. Chen shows pure jade fittings, there is not one piece of bronze, iron/steel fitting to be seen, only yellow jade. Anyway, thanks for brushing up my knowledge of Han swords. May I suggest you brush up on your classical Chinese or at least on the modern Mandarin, then you could read some more on the history of Chinese swords .;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2008 2:00:19 GMT
Well below the jade ones. Although those are dao fitting...but then again dao became the sword of choice in the later han era. But that isn't to say that the jian was stopped entirely. Basically late era han swords were dao with brass fittings. When a jian was made in that era, it would be steel with similar brass fittings. And of course you can't discount the era of transition. Swords don't change styles overnight after all. A steel jian with brass fitting in the early han era style might be rare...but it would still be a historical sword (assuming everything else is correct for the era). It is a replica of an archeologist's wet dream...but still realistic .
|
|
|
Post by lol74 on Jul 24, 2008 0:33:32 GMT
Thanks for your replys, Napalm and LoL. The pic of Th. Chen shows pure jade fittings, there is not one piece of bronze, iron/steel fitting to be seen, only yellow jade. Anyway, thanks for brushing up my knowledge of Han swords. May I suggest you brush up on your classical Chinese or at least on the modern Mandarin, then you could read some more on the history of Chinese swords .;D Dude I am chinese.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2008 1:58:37 GMT
My wife, too, but my university wenyanwen is much butter and exacter than her guessing, dude!
|
|