|
Post by chrisoro on Jun 21, 2016 21:30:46 GMT
Does anyone know how the pommel nut, grip and decorations on the current production Cold Steel Gim looks like? In Paul Southren's review of the sword they look like this: However, in the product pictures of the sword at Kultofathena.com the grip, pommel nut and decorations looks like this (which I think is far less attractive): And then I found the following picture in this forum thread on here, with yet another look, and what appears to be a grip like in the first picture, but without a brass cross pin: I know the sword isn't historically accurate, but I generally like the looks and price of it, and judging from the review mentioned above, it seems to perform great at cutting as well. However, the question of how the grip, the pommel nut and the decorations looks in the current production swords, bugs me a bit. Is anyone able to share some light on this? (I hope this is the correct forum for this kind of question.)
|
|
|
Post by Timo Nieminen on Jun 21, 2016 21:58:41 GMT
The KoA model is newer than the reviewed model. AFAIK, it's still current.
I prefer the new nut to the old one. It could be improved by removing it, and filing off the corners, making it round instead of hex, and it'll look like a washer than the tang has been peened over, rather than a modern hex nut.
It isn't bad historically; there are Qing and Ming examples of similar pommels and guards (and grips). Not the most common style, but still historical.
|
|
|
Post by chrisoro on Jun 25, 2016 9:38:24 GMT
Thanks for the info!
|
|