|
Post by pellius on Jun 8, 2016 15:05:24 GMT
I have sifted thru quite a lot of info regarding the Cutting Jian. There is a ton of great info, including a detailed review on this very site. While I'm sure the answer is out there, I haven't found an answer to my question:
Is the Hanwei/Rodell Cutting Jian suitable for thrusting and parrying?
I have yet to train jian, but viewing YouTube videos of forms and techniques as well as text descriptions, it seems to my untrained eye that many of the jian techniques (other than slashes and cuts) would function better in practice (against another weapon) if the sword were rigid rather than flexible.
I'm presuming that Mr. Rodell knew what he was doing when overseeing this jian's development. Can you guys give me a little insight on this? Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by Timo Nieminen on Jun 8, 2016 21:49:28 GMT
It's well-balanced for thrusting and parrying. It isn't too flexible for parrying - you'd parry with the base of the blade, anyway, which is the stiffest part.
I don't think it's too flexible for thrusting. It isn't designed for fighting armoured opponents, so rigid enough to pierce clothing with a thrust is good enough (note: try it on a cloth-wrapped water bottle).
It's a cut-and-thrust sword, and therefore a compromise. The blade needs to be wide enough to cut well, especially near the tip. There are two ways to achieve that width: you either keep the same blade weight and make the tip wide but thin, or you keep the same thickness, and make the blade wider and therefore heavier. The first gives you a cutting-oriented sword, while the second gives you a cut-thrust sword. This jian uses the second. 3.5mm near the tip isn't thin - only a bit thinner than a needle-pointed thrusting-oriented longsword (KoA's stats).
|
|