Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2008 0:52:45 GMT
believe it or not but take a look
|
|
|
Post by alvin on May 14, 2008 1:03:51 GMT
I am always amazed with those slow-motion camera shots. But I think I would rather be the one with the gun. Thanks loki for the video. Karma 2 U.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2008 1:52:14 GMT
Not THAT surprising. Bullets are made from lead and copper...both of which is MUCH softer then steel. I think any sharp sword in a vice would do the same thing to bullet. Of course the person behind the sword would get hit by two bullets instead of one so it's still in favor of the gun anyways.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2008 8:45:41 GMT
A similar test has been performed and published on this forum... /index.cgi?action=display&board=forumcafe&thread=975&page=1 /index.cgi?action=display&board=swordreviews&thread=1955&page=1
I had some trouble finding these before... now bookmarked so I can paste these when this is brought up again in a few months...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2008 2:54:43 GMT
I really want to see it so that the sword twisted during the cutting, that way the bullets would go to the sides, and may miss a person. Now who wants to volunteer?
|
|
|
Post by salvatore on Jun 2, 2008 3:00:24 GMT
People always say, "lead is softer than steel, of course it didn't do anything".
Even if it's softer, a projectile flying at that velocity would certainly damage a poorly made blade.
|
|