|
Post by applejack on Jun 29, 2015 22:50:27 GMT
well this is something i been wanting to know for a know for a all time. Lets said i have 2 mossberg Long range MVP rifles one in 5.56 and the other in 7.62mm NATO and they both have 20'' Fluted Medium Bull barrels and 2 of the same suppressor on them. Which one whould be quieter with a suppressor with reg ammo and which one would be a better sniper rilfe up to 600 yards(223 with 75gr MK HP and 308 with 175 gr MK HP)? also which one in a mad max/ end of the world would be easy to make/find subsonic ammo for?
|
|
|
Post by munk on Aug 29, 2015 5:41:50 GMT
My opinions:
With all else being equal, the 5.56 will be quieter with both sub and super sonic ammo. This is due to a few things, namely the smaller bore and less explosive gas being produced.
As far as which would be a better sniper rifle, that sort of depends. The 5.56 will have a flatter trajectory but retain less energy over that distance. The 7.62 will have more bullet drop but maintain more energy, so "better" would sort of depend on what you'd be using it for?
In terms of which would be a better rifle for a mad max / post-apocalyptic scenario in terms of subsonic ammo, again hard to say. Subsonic 7.62 will have more energy than a subsonic 5.56 (which is essentially a .22 at that point), but you won't be finding much if any subsonic ammo for either, and I imagine "making" subsonic ammo for either would be equally difficult...though I suppose you'd need less materials (lead, powder, etc.) for the 5.56. If you consider an AR-15, you can buy a .22 conversion bolt and turn your 5.56 into a .22 on the fly. This would give you the ability to use subsonic .22 ammo in your AR15 which is (or was) relatively cheap to stock and super quiet through a suppressor. Not the best choice for two-legged threats but a pretty good choice for small game hunting, which in all honesty, would be more advantageous in such a scenario.
|
|
|
Post by aussie-rabbit on Aug 29, 2015 9:54:57 GMT
|
|
nddave
Member
Posts: 4,134
Member is Online
|
Post by nddave on Oct 19, 2015 3:41:08 GMT
Not much into guns but after seeing this thread I thought I'd chime in what I did today.
My Dad, brother and me were up on our property today and my brother's friend came up. He had a .45 with a 12" suppressor and had me try it out. I don't shoot guns much so figuring it's a .45 I better hold firm. Well I didn't need to because that suppressor did it's job well because it felt and sounded like I was shooting a .22! It was crazy how much that suppressor changed the handling and noise, all you could really hear was the slide.
Anyway just thought I'd share real quick, this was the first time I ever shot with one and I was very impressed.
|
|
|
Post by morningstar7 on Nov 9, 2015 16:06:23 GMT
Difference in sound with supersonic ammo is a pretty moot point. You're talking less than 10dB at the muzzle. That said, the 7.62 will in all actuality be the better choice out past 400m. Not saying that the 5.56 isn't capable of accuracy at that range, but it does lack mass, so shots on living targets will not be as effective as 7.62. I've killed feral hogs in Texas with 5.56 @ 200m, so it is definitely a capable round, just not as efficient as 7.62.
|
|
|
Post by munk on Nov 10, 2015 4:07:54 GMT
Well, most reputible rifle suppressors are capable of a nose reduction of 20 to 30 db (which would be all muzzle noise since suppressors have no impact on flight noise). 20 dbs may not seem like much, but when you're talking about the logarithmic nature of dbs, it means a 75% "percieved" reduction in loudness (every 10db halves the percieved loudness as a general rule). For example, 120dbs sounds about half as loud as 130dbs.
But you're absolutely right about the 7.62 having way more punch at 400 yards.
|
|
|
Post by StevenJ on Nov 29, 2015 6:07:53 GMT
Just a not here on conversion kits. If you are thinking of a conversion kit I would personally buy an additional rifle instead. It costs as much to buy an entire 22 lr rifle, sometimes less, than these 'conversion kits'. Same thing with semi auto hand gun 22 lr conversion kits, many times it's just cheaper to find a 22 lr hand gun. Cans, suppressors are expensive in the US because of all the ATF paper work etc. If you really want subsonic 22 lr, I'd just find a Savage, Ruger, or Marlin either semi auto or bolt action 22 lr. Heck two months back my friend sold me his semi auto Savage 22 Lr for $120 and it looks like it's almost brand new! You'll be lucky to find one of these conversion kits for less than $300 most of the time. The pistol conversion kits I saw for hand guns usually run in the $400 range.
|
|
|
Post by munk on Nov 29, 2015 17:12:23 GMT
I purchased a drop-in conversion bolt for my AR15 several years back for about $175 with 2 magazines included, looks like they can still be had for about that price: www.cheaperthandirt.com/product/2-CMMG22BA6E1Other things to consider when trying to decide between a conversion kit and a separate rifle: - getting the barrel threaded if the secondary rifle isn't threaded already (not sure of price, ~$75?) - getting additional accessories like optics, slings, rails, etc. instead of being able to leverage the ones you already have for double duty ($50 for a cheap optic up to $1000+ depending on what all you have) - getting use to different ergonomics instead of using a platform that you're already practiced with - more stuff to lug around to the range (and more space used up in a safe) with 2 rifles as compared to 1 + conversion bolt For me, I put a lot of thought and money into getting my AR15 setup just the way I wanted, and would gladly pay the extra $50 to benefit from all those things when shooting 22. When all is said and done, it was way cheaper to do it with a bolt than have to buy a second set of gear for a separate rifle.
|
|
pgandy
Moderator
Senior Forumite
Posts: 10,296
|
Post by pgandy on Nov 29, 2015 17:42:04 GMT
At that range go with the 7.62 NATO. As for the noise level you will need subsonic ammo to take full advantage of a suppressor.
|
|
|
Post by reynolds on Oct 30, 2018 19:20:59 GMT
well this is something i been wanting to know for a know for a all time. Lets said i have 2 mossberg Long range MVP rifles one in 5.56 and the other in 7.62mm NATO and they both have 20'' Fluted Medium Bull barrels and 2 of the same suppressor on them. Which one whould be quieter with a suppressor with reg ammo and which one would be a better sniper rilfe up to 600 yards(223 with 75gr MK HP and 308 with 175 gr MK HP)? also which one in a mad max/ end of the world would be easy to make/find subsonic ammo for? the only way you'll have subsonic ammo for either one is if you've stored it. Dont handicap yourself with the 1 shot per second bolt action (wild, hip shots) Get an M4 and a Ciener .22lr conversion unit. The 1 in 9" rifling is ideal for the 60 gr Aquila .22 subsonic ammo and you'll have rapidfire, luminous iron sights, one hand use, concealment in your pack (taken down) the ability to use night scope, laser, etc. www.22lrconversions.com/atch-pg.htmammoseek.com/ammo/22lr/-rimfire-60grains-
|
|