|
Post by AlvaroWang on Feb 24, 2015 4:27:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Timo Nieminen on Feb 24, 2015 5:19:51 GMT
When it's a "beautiful flower ornamenting the handle", it's a tubular rivet. The "petals" are a washer over which the end of the rivet is bent outwards.
Whether the hole is vacant or there's a tubular rivet, if the hole is large enough, it can be used for a tassel or lanyard.
Sometimes, a bamboo pin, like a Japanese mekugi is used. Small empty holes might just have lost the pin. Or the rivet was removed to allow the grip to be removed. The tang would (traditionally) have been peened at the pommel (or, modern style, there's a pommel nut), so the pin is just for added security, so it isn't a big deal if it comes out, or the rivet isn't replaced if removed.
|
|
|
Post by AlvaroWang on Feb 24, 2015 23:22:17 GMT
Is there any info on people who just put the hole in there but there is no rivet?
I ask this because the presence of such a hole would indicate a better constructed sword, but if there are people who just put the whole and the "beautiful flower", it would be useless to search for such a thing
|
|
|
Post by Timo Nieminen on Feb 25, 2015 1:01:42 GMT
I've never seen one with a fake "flower". Maybe somebody does it. But a hole, rivet, pin or empty, doesn't mean a better constructed sword. The weakens the grip and tang (if the tang is wide and thick enough, it won't weaken it enough to matter). If it's empty, then the only possible benefit is for a lanyard. Some makers might (will!) use a pin/rivet to stop a grip with too much space between it and the tang from moving around. This disguises bad construction, rather than indicating good construction.
|
|
|
Post by AlvaroWang on Feb 26, 2015 2:52:41 GMT
I see, tks for the info!
|
|