|
Post by snubnoze on Apr 22, 2021 23:23:54 GMT
treeslicer Thanks I figured I couldn't be the only one looking at it
|
|
|
Post by snubnoze on Jul 24, 2021 4:09:34 GMT
I have this M1867 pipeback version coming my way:
|
|
|
Post by snubnoze on Jul 24, 2021 4:14:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by snubnoze on Jul 24, 2021 4:23:24 GMT
Some more image contributions to the thread:
|
|
|
Post by pellius on Jul 24, 2021 4:32:09 GMT
Was that the one offered by Jonathan Walker? Just curious. That one looked very nice.
|
|
|
Post by snubnoze on Jul 24, 2021 6:33:11 GMT
Was that the one offered by Jonathan Walker? Just curious. That one looked very nice. Yup, that's the one. Couldn't pass on it when I saw his post.
|
|
|
Post by pellius on Jul 24, 2021 6:36:29 GMT
Congrats on getting a great sword
|
|
|
Post by Pino on Jul 25, 2021 0:40:57 GMT
Just for clarification, in regards to the dismounted officer sword (the one with pipeback blade and no ears rivets), the changes were the following with scabbards:
1875-1878: upper ring removed and changed with a side-ring 1893: spacing between rings reduced 1899: both rings merged into one
|
|
|
Post by pellius on Jul 25, 2021 1:19:32 GMT
Just for clarification, in regards to the dismounted officer sword (the one with pipeback blade and no ears rivets), the changes were the following with scabbards: 1875-1878: upper ring removed and changed with a side-ring 1893: spacing between rings reduced 1899: both rings merged into one Thanks for the info, as always.
|
|
|
Post by snubnoze on Jul 25, 2021 1:25:33 GMT
Just for clarification, in regards to the dismounted officer sword (the one with pipeback blade and no ears rivets), the changes were the following with scabbards: 1875-1878: upper ring removed and changed with a side-ring 1893: spacing between rings reduced 1899: both rings merged into one Thanks. So if the two rings are present on the scabbard, that would date the sword between 1867-1874, correct?
|
|
|
Post by Pino on Jul 25, 2021 3:39:18 GMT
Yes, I would even say 1867-78 as changes took time to be fully implemented.
|
|
|
Post by snubnoze on Jul 25, 2021 5:12:24 GMT
Yes, I would even say 1867-78 as changes took time to be fully implemented. Thank you that narrows it down for me.
The later Neuhausen swords are much easier to date because they put the year right there on the ricasso.
|
|