Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2007 21:21:06 GMT
does anyone have experience with this type of sword? i think it is next on the "to buy" list.
jason
|
|
|
Post by jpfranco on Jun 28, 2007 22:40:02 GMT
I own two Type XIV swords. The first one a is a copy of one of the famous Oakeshoot sword found in the book: The sword in the age of chivalry. It was made by Windlass under the name sword of Dracula and Medieval short sword. It is a fantastic little sword as stated in the My Armoury review: www.myarmoury.com/review_mrl_medshort.html![](http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/3166/oakeshotttypexiv1ur2.th.jpg) Click to enlarge The second one I found in an accouterments store for $150 canadian. It is a Windlass discontinued model known as the Archer sword. ![](http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/6743/oakeshotttypexiv2uk7.th.jpg) ![](http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/2995/oakeshotttypexiv21dm4.th.jpg) Click to enlarge Both Have the short and wide blade of the Type XIV and are about the same weight (around 3lbs). I absolutely love these two swords. The balance is great and they handle beautifully. I did not do any cutting but I can assure you that the blades are sturdy, they are tightly put together and the blades are not "whippy" at all. I know that Windlass came out with another model which also got good reviews on My Armoury: www.myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=10480Hope this helps.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2007 23:22:15 GMT
I'm personally more of a type XVI fan myself. It's similar in that it's a broad blade with a slender taper down towards a fairly acute point, and they can be of similar dimensions, but the type XVI has a diamond cross section whereas the XIV is lenticular... both work very well, but the XVI would have a stiffer point, and I like that.
A good sword type.
|
|
|
Post by jpfranco on Jun 28, 2007 23:35:58 GMT
The type XIV was the last sword desing to defeat mail. That is why it is a little different that the type XVI. But you are right Adam, both a neat "little" swords.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2007 0:03:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jpfranco on Jun 29, 2007 0:30:28 GMT
Overall length and the grip. 11/2 hand versus one hand. The Abredo(a type XVIII according to Oekeshott) is more of a war sword of the cut and thrust type, as for the type XIV, it would be a close quarter combat sword design to defeat mail(so a cutting/slashing sword primarily) and something noblemen would carry in cities and burghs because of its shorter blade.
These are just educated guess based on what I read in "The Sword At The Age Of Chivalry" by Ewart Oakeshott.
|
|
|
Post by ShooterMike on Jun 29, 2007 1:28:33 GMT
I'm a big fan of the Type XIV. I have an Angus Trim DD1404 "Moonbrand" that I adore. I also have another ATrim, an AT1312, that kind of seems like a Type XII / Type XIV hybrid. And it is also a great sword. Gus could probably offer more info on its actual type.
After reading all the reviews and comments on myArmoury, I have decided my next sword will likely be the MRL Type XIV. I've heard good things about it and nothing bad. And for the price, it seems like a smart buy.
|
|
|
Post by randomnobody on Jun 29, 2007 1:36:37 GMT
I've been eying Windlass' type XIV myself. Yes, I keep my eye on many, many bladed things. I rather like it as a shorter sword, but have been rather anxious about Windlass/MRL's reputation. It's comforting to know this particular model seems pretty well done.
Can't argue with the price, either. Might pick one up. In a few months, when I have money again, and have bought everything else I'm supposed to be buying...
I need to meet a millionaire...
|
|
|
Post by ShooterMike on Jun 29, 2007 1:45:09 GMT
Overall length and the grip. 11/2 hand versus one hand. The Abredo(a type XVIII according to Oekeshott) is more of a war sword of the cut and thrust type, as for the type XIV, it would be a close quarter combat sword design to defeat mail(so a cutting/slashing sword primarily) and something noblemen would carry in cities and burghs because of its shorter blade. JP, That's mostly true for the XVIII types/subtypes, however don't forget that some of them where handy little swords like the Henry V sword. The biggest difference is like Adam said, XIV has a lenticular cross section and is designed for defeating mail, mostly by cutting more than thrusting. And it almost always has a pronounced fuller(s) that runs 2/3 to 3/4 the length of the blade. XVIII is diamond cross section, usually hollow ground, and made for cutting and thrusting into openings in plate armor, thus piercing mail and leather armor. The only historical drawback I see to the Windlass/MRL Type XIV is its diamond cross section. But in a modern, inexpensive sword, I can over look that. ![:D](//storage.forums.net/forum/images/smiley/grin.png)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2007 2:00:50 GMT
I have the "Drac" too, and I concur with JP's comments. I have cut extensively with mine and only the slightest loosenes has developed in the hilt, but it has never reached the point where I felt the need to hammer on the tang or anything. The blade is now scratched to heck, but no bends or other damage. I got mine on eBay a few years ago for $100, and it included a wood scabbard by Tom Carr of SFI. Small world, eh? ![8-)](//storage.forums.net/forum/images/smiley/cool.png) Sword of Dracula/Medieval Short Sword (w/ obligatory cat ;D). ![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v438/GSH70/HPIM0076.jpg) Which reminds me, I'm just itchin' to know whether Windlass's newest Type XIV has a peened tang or threaded pommel. If I could be sure it was peened, it would be at the top of my list, too. www.museumreplicas.com/webstore/eCat/swords_and_knive/historical/swords/oakeshott_type_iv.aspx (still listed as a Type IV ![::)](//storage.forums.net/forum/images/smiley/eyesroll.png) ).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2007 5:46:40 GMT
I am a big fan of the Type XIV myself. It is tapered but still has enough mass near the tip to make a good tipcut. I requested of Clyde that Generation 2 make a version of this sword a while ago. I would love to do some pell work with this sword.
|
|
|
Post by Brendan Olszowy on Jul 4, 2007 8:51:26 GMT
Sword of Dracula/Medieval Short Sword (w/ obligatory cat ;D). ![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v438/GSH70/HPIM0076.jpg) Those stinky cats just have to get into everything sword like we do hey? You know why? They are the Kings of sharp pointy razor like objects as any cat owner will attest. They hold terror at the tips of their fingers. They pitty our need for pointy tools, saying "You ain't no badd ass, I'll 'av ya". They'll just run under your thrust and up your pants leg and your done for... ![:'(](//storage.forums.net/forum/images/smiley/cry.png)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2007 21:16:33 GMT
They'll just run under your thrust and up your pants leg and your done for... ![:'(](//storage.forums.net/forum/images/smiley/cry.png) Bwahahaaaaa! So true! When you have 5 daggers attached to each hand (foot), you fear no man! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2007 21:32:36 GMT
My cats are equally as egomaniacal, and a few are just as ballsy.
|
|