|
Post by Ninjadave89 on Feb 26, 2012 16:04:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Kilted Cossack on Feb 26, 2012 19:24:05 GMT
Yup, that's a dang solid looking tang right there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2012 6:03:00 GMT
Very interesting. I didn't know that they had the machinery to thread tangs back then, though I suppose 1895 is pretty late in the century.
|
|
|
Post by Kilted Cossack on Feb 28, 2012 12:22:30 GMT
Ha! Those go back quite a bit farther than 1895, KoreanGuy. I knew I'd run across the information in the past, but with only a 'starting level' of coffee in my bloodstream, this was the first source I could come up with. www.myarmoury.com/review_ebe_hanger.htmlRelevant extract:
|
|
|
Post by MrAcheson on Feb 28, 2012 14:53:37 GMT
Cutting a thread into a tang isn't difficult. Even before the tap and die or machine lathe, you could do it with a file and a simple guide. That's is how they made screws for centuries until the industrial revolution. Threaded tangs have been around since at least the Renaissance.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2012 0:30:13 GMT
Ah I see. I didn't think that they were completely incapable of doing it, just that the idea wasn't around or that making them by hand would be time consuming with little advantages. The replacement blade thing makes sense though.
|
|
|
Post by MrAcheson on Feb 29, 2012 12:13:32 GMT
It's not just a replacement blade. Screw on pommels also allowed the sword to be taken down for maintenance. The hilts can also be easily tightened if they loosen unlike peened pommels. Screw on pommels have the Tiffany Problem though, they generally look too modern even though they're actually period correct for many swords.
|
|