|
Post by mikejapan on Nov 21, 2010 6:41:40 GMT
What is the difference between 5160 and 9260 steel?
Mikejapan
|
|
TomK
Member
Senior Forumite
Posts: 2,377
|
Post by TomK on Nov 21, 2010 8:11:51 GMT
the 51 and the 92. different elements are used to achieve the same effect. unless you are a smith there are a lot of fiddling little details differences you don't need to worry about. if you are a smith or intend to make a sword out of these you are asking in the wrong place, and you need a lot more technical info than you are likely to get here.
from a sword owner and user's standpoint the differences are very slight. I have sharpened and polished and cut with many swords made of both types of steel and the only difference I can really say jumps out at me is that 9260 tends to give way under abrasives faster than 5160, but the difference is not one you'd likely notice unless you have sharpened a lot of swords. both steels are very good for swords and whether a sword made from them is going to be any good or not is going to matter entirely on the maker and how it was made.
|
|
|
Post by chuckinohio on Nov 21, 2010 9:02:24 GMT
The difference is-
They are same same for all intents and purposes.
What works for 5160 seems to work just as well for 9260 as far as heat treating goes.
|
|
|
Post by Brendan Olszowy on Nov 22, 2010 2:53:15 GMT
Yep, chemical wise the specs are the same apart from the addition of a little bit of chromium (0.7- 0.9%). Nowhere near as much chromium as a stainless blade though, which will often contain 12 to 20%. Chromium is added to an alloy to assist the depth penetration of hardening in the quench, and makes it more responsive to heat treatment. However it can make the steel more temperamental during forging, increasing the likelyhood of cracks.
|
|