Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2010 2:09:28 GMT
I was over at You Tube searching for something and lo and behold what did I see on my suggestions page but this:
While I do not doubt the skill and mastery of the Master performing the form. Does this not represent some of the BS that we are having to overcome to bring back historical Taiji sword arts? The exaggerated stances, the floppy Wushu blade, the fact that when the slow motion vid is viewed there are several postures that would result in all but the most skilled swordsman (or swordswoman) cutting him or herself to ribbons during practice sessions. (Sorry I'm not able to embed to slow motion version of the video.)
Anyway, contrast this with the "Classical" Yang sword form, which enough people have trouble saying they can see the practical uses in.
Videos like the first are all over the place and we have websites like the one for Louisville Shaolim Do (their spelling not mine) claiming taiji was invented by the Shaolin Monk Chang San Feng at the Shaolin monastery, and yet we wonder why nobody takes us seriously as martial artists. Anyway, sorry for the rant just needed to blow off some steam.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2010 4:37:25 GMT
www.chipellis.com/videos/Dong%20Zeng%20Chen/DZC%20videos.htm#JienHere's a form from the Tung Ying Chieh (Dong Ying Jie) lineage which is descended from Yang Cheng Fu. Notice that in this lineage's form many of the parries are minimized to almost be missing. The CMC form you posted contains the original parries. You have to realize that by Yang Cheng Fu's time, the rise of the firearm made true swordfighting irrelevant. From that time on, you can see degeneration of the form, and key moves end up being changed or missing all together. Of course by this time many generations of teachers do not really know how to fight with the sword and many think the floppy wushu blade was how the real weapon was like. Wu style Tai Chi Jian actually has many more visible techniques, note that Wu branched off from second generation Yang style, Forms from that generation are more visibly martial in nature and are more difficult to perform than third generation Yang (YCF). While the first video you posted has exaggerated movements, there are many basic parries, cuts and thrusts in it. Low stances develops stamina, strength and power. Exaggerated moves are a problem and don't convey the proper coverage needed for fighting. Now, even in later generation sword forms, there are usable techniques in them if you know what to look for or have a teacher to show it to you. Michuan Yang jian by Scott Rodell starts by teaching basic cuts and drills before ever teaching form.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2010 11:01:23 GMT
Gundoggy, Yes, I've noticed that about WU style before. And there is a generational change between the forms derived from Yang Ban Hou and Yang Chen Fu. Much as there is a change between the YCF forms and what is currently being taught by Yang Zhen Duo and Yang Jun. If one tries to trace things back to before the Chen family who taught Yang Lu Chan we either get the mythological roots of taiji as being invented by the Taoist Scholar Chang San Feng (from the Wudang region) or we find military documents like - General QI Jiguang's "Quanjing Jieyao Pian" also now as Jixiaoxinshu. (I have the .pdf of this if anybody wants it, although it references an out of print book for the illustrations which I have not yet been able to track down a copy of.) And yes again, firearms do make swordsmanship irrelevant on a battlefield. There are many days I just wish our arts had been better preserved over time. The JSA guys have it so easy by comparison there. Again sorry about the rant, but I have also been in a few arguments lately over whether or not taiji is a legitimate combat art on some other websites. I'm also beginning to have some issues with the modern Wudang taiji style which came out of Hong Kong. As for the low stances, Laojia Chen taijiquan also uses lots of them, and they are important training techniques for those who can do them. That's one of the reason I prefer the CMC/ZMQ style for it's middle and high frame stances - but in my case that is solely personal preference. I will also not deny the role of my own styles founder Professor Cheng Man Ch'ing in promoting the health aspects of taiji to almost the exclusion of the martial aspects, although the martial aspects are considered important in this style and we are to practice our forms with martial intent in mind. There are usable martial techniques in that first vid I posted, if you know where and how to look for them. There are actually several pommel strikes buried in that form which the WMA guys will point out can be devastating techniques when used properly. However, sliding the blade of your own sword along your body while turning, just seems like an accident waiting to happen to me. Scott Rodell and GRTC are doing a great deal to bring about a return to historical, practical sword skills in the Taiji world. His work is our "Reclaiming the Blade." Once my tax refund gets here this year I'll finally be able to pick up his work (book and DVD) along with "The Complete Taiji Dao" which although written by a master of the Wu style (I still don't get that tilt thing they do, I like vertical myself ) does reference the modern 13 saber form used by the Yang style. I know there's an older Yang based saber form but I haven't found much on it apart form a few DVDs I haven't been able to afford. Again, my apologies to the forum for the rant but I get tired of having to defend myself as actually practicing a martial art all the time
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2010 12:55:27 GMT
There's a fair share of martial stuff in there, I will agree. In fact, that first one is the most "martial" bit of taiji (taichi with a different spelling?) I've ever seen.
But, it's meant as a showmanship skill or light aerobic exercise; that's where those crouching lunges come in. In reality, it's begging to be overrun, but here it's just a more fun way to exercise your body a bit.
M.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2010 14:26:37 GMT
The more people think your art is only exercise and useless in combat, the beneficial it is for you!!!
Why enlighten them at all???
My own Sifu commented that many Tai Chi forms have innocuous looking moves so that one can practice them openly yet techniques are hidden.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2010 14:58:47 GMT
I know, it's just the scoffing from the MMA guys (like I really should give that much credence) and the JSA guys gets to me a bit sometimes. I really shouldn't let it, but it does occasionally.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2010 3:59:19 GMT
Liam I reread this thread it stirred some memories.
I've noted that in many demonstrations of use of Tai Chi Jian (especially public forms) the Duifang is using a long energy committed cut. This is analogous to empty hand demonstrations where the guy typically attacks with ONE long energy fully committed attack.
Then when you try to use the application where the guy uses short energy attacks from strong defensive positions, it's hard to pull off. Kind of like trying to use empty hand technique that worked in demo but now the guy is feinting and jabbing and it doesn't work!!!
On GRTC, there were discussions that the later public jian form may have moves that dealt with dissimilar weapons...shorter/longer that may not be ideal against another jian.
Now caveat is that the moves do work in the right situation, I have used certain public yang jian moves in freeplay successfully usually this is very rare.
A good system should have effective techniques against both long energy and short energy (jab like) attacks!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2010 16:18:05 GMT
I believe this is why GRTC also teaches the Michuan Jian form, to compensate for the shortcomings of the public Jian form. This is also why in my personal practice I have been adding elements of German Longsword to make up for gaps in the form. Especially since I have not yet learned the classical form, but know the Beijing simplified 32 step form which has even more gaps in application knowledge.
I have been told that the classical form was derived by sword vs spear rather than sword vs sword, but I do not know if this is true. It would be nice if we could actually talk to the old masters to more correctly see what their intent was in creating the forms, but all we have is the forms and what we can find of the principles. This does very much put us in the same boat as the WMA people trying to rebuild lost knowledge. In our case the knowledge isn't lost, but it was corrupted. You and Garrett have shown me errors in my own thoughts about this many times, for which I thank you.
Yes, a good system shows how to handle any attack, what we seem to need to do, is take what we do know of our system and expand that knowledge through our own practices using every resource we have available even if it means borrowing from other styles of swordsmanship. As long as we keep our own movements in keeping with the Taiji principles, and remain Sung - it is still taiji. This is my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by genocideseth on Mar 15, 2010 20:11:12 GMT
Well if it is the MMA guys giving you a hard time, ask them if they want to try their MMA skills against you with a Jian. As far as swordsman ship goes, I don't know what to think. You could never test the ability of the swordsmen correctly unless he partook in a duel using live blades. When one spars with wooden swords, he does not have the adrenaline to speed his body. He does not feel the same sense of panic. Although you can get pretty close to it when both swordsmen partake in a duel (With wooden swords) in full contact and no armor. ;D I would know... It is freaking scary. If your skill is not up to par, your going to get a good sized bruise. My older brother broke his wooden sword on my leg and I cut open my friends chin once.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2010 2:57:04 GMT
MMA guys are just on hype because of the popularity of the UFC.... sensationalism is all it is. i had a MMA fan ask me if taiji had any grappling moves. i told him sure.. chin na. he was like show me one. he thought it was lame until he found himself unable to move his arm for the hyper extension of his elbow and a finger press on the rotator cuff. then he was like oh crap... he hasnt asked for any further demo.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2010 3:37:29 GMT
I've casually sparred some MMA guys at the college before, and a lot of underestimating of traditional arts comes from the rules and, I thought most importantly, the gloves.
Example: One guy I fought had about thirty pounds on me. I still got in a couple clean shots and took him to the ground (funny that a lot don't recognize Shuai Jiao moves) but the others still gave him the match due to two hooks he got on me. Later, I was helping him with some different strikes and he decided to sneak in a front kick at me. By instinct, I did a fairly messy Brushing Knee (I think that's how you translate it) and knocked the wind out of him. He asked why I didn't do that during sparring and I replied that there are a lot better ways of attacking available when you don't have to strike through an inch of squishy foam.
But few are going to risk fighting bare knuckled just to demonstrate effectiveness and so MMA guys will continue to mock.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2010 4:45:34 GMT
correct translation... yes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2010 11:23:14 GMT
You know it's funny I ran into one of those MMA guys again. Apparently even though I have to walk with a cane these days he still couldn't casually knock me down. (Bastard tried to kick my cane out from under me at the shopping mall.) Anyway, the moral of the story I remained standing and several retirees who were present decided to start berating the young man and giving chase. They may be old but they ain't dead. Age and treachery....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2010 0:57:47 GMT
if you watch ufc you already know half of them are just brawler. i saw one match where an actual combat style trained juijutsu black blet took one of those jokers out in less than 8 seconds.
they assume that most, probably true, martial artist only train with tag points in a slap fight style tournament.
this assumption is unfortunately true in modern taiji since the applications arent taught. here in usa they teach it mostly for exercise and therapy, and of course you have the performance arts like wushu. thank goodness for folks like the ymaa, and grtc, and the such who actually teach the self defense.
|
|
|
Post by padric101 on Apr 12, 2010 10:58:57 GMT
Hey all, just posting in as a tai chi player, I learned chen style in kowloon, taiwan, May '70. I soon became aware that my celtic physic was not meant for the low long stances, I switched to Cheng Man Ching's yang style short form. I picked that up in the early '80s and haven't looked back. I teach a class in the Theodosia, MO. area. Also look at the site gilmanstudios.com. Well bye for now, Padric
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2010 9:13:46 GMT
In Kowloon, Hongkong or/and in Taiwan? Which lineages? I do more styles, Chen, Yang and a bit ZMQ.
|
|
|
Post by padric101 on Apr 14, 2010 11:46:40 GMT
Thank you for straightening me out. Keelung, Taiwan was the place I was really thinking about. I've stuck pretty much to yang style. As far as lineage. I believe this is padric style, I learned the basics, fundamentals, from some one. I have learned from a variety of teachers, most taught me, or I was learnable ( spell checked it), what tai chi was. Tai chi saber and jian has been self taught.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2010 0:33:40 GMT
Oh, the rainy harbour city. Good seafood, though!
|
|
|
Post by padric101 on Apr 15, 2010 0:54:00 GMT
and tall Taiwan beer, made by the Taiwan rice and tobacco company
|
|