|
Post by RufusScorpius on Jul 4, 2021 11:33:30 GMT
I have always believed in the concept of "put up or shut up". So here is a video I did while working for a few weeks in Essen, Germany. Markus 313 was kind enough to open his gym for me and help me with the video. I apologize for the quality, but video production is something I don't have much skill with.
I hope this video answers some of the questions that have been asked on the forum lately. It is a BASIC explanation of kata holds and the fundamentals of how it was designed to be used in conjunction with human physiology. THIS IS NOT A TECHNIQUE PRIMER. Techniques are taught under the various "schools", however, they all have the fundamentals in common.
And rest assured, the other 3 hours not shown on video were spent showing some much more advanced movements. I hope you enjoy the video, and once again, big thanks to Markus for hosting me for the day!
Now, let the comment flames begin!
|
|
tera
Moderator
Posts: 1,435
|
Post by tera on Jul 4, 2021 17:10:26 GMT
In before any flamewar. First, much respect for making the video and also for sharing it. I know my form is improper as I did not reach Dan rank in either of the arts I studied. I may reluctantly do some test-cutting videos as part of reviews, but I'm sure I'll look like a mess.
So thanks for your courage and initiative!
|
|
|
Post by RufusScorpius on Jul 4, 2021 17:53:13 GMT
The only way to get over the fear of criticism is to just put out your video and let "be what it be". You don't have to be perfect, just share what you do!
My form isn't "proper" either, as far as I know. In any event, unless you are a 90 year old pure blood Japanese master who has been studying since the age of 6, somebody will find something to point out what you are doing is wrong. I had recent shoulder surgery that prevents me from full activity, otherwise I would have also posted some sparring videos. Sparring separates the talkers from the doers. However, there is a video of me sparring with Markus last year (although I had a bad knee and jet lag) in which I went in completely blind to the saber. I really enjoyed going up against something I was totally unfamiliar with, I think it's good to step outside of your comfort zone.
Again, there's another 2.5 hours or so NOT on film in which we went over some more advanced tactics. I think we both learned a lot from each other, and that is what I think we should be doing more of. In my mind, it's not about what is "better" because each style or weapon type has it's benefits and shortcomings.
|
|
|
Post by tsmspace on Jul 5, 2021 11:25:00 GMT
I'm ready to enter into the flame war.
Right at the beginning you make a very common statement. You say do not touch a sharp sword until properly trained. I want to talk about this and some things about it.
If a person is going to learn to light a fire, (get it,, flamewar?), they don't practice moving their hand under the sticks for a period of time, perhaps weeks, before they ever hold a flame. Actually, first you introduce the person to a lighter, tell them to be careful, and not to move around while the fire is lit, and then you show them how to work the lighter. Then they practice making the lighter light, and merely being in control of a lit lighter. They first practice paying attention to a dangerous object, and then they don't learn another move until they are prepared to first be aware of the danger of the object.
Then when they go to light the fire, they practice trying to start all kinds of things on fire, and likely they just start one little stick or piece of grass and then it goes out. Perhaps they even burn a page of paper and still fail. Eventually they move up in amount until something is over the top enough to light a fire. But, never do they simply make the motions of moving the lighter into position. They don't start moving around until they are already learning how to move the dangerous object. The first time they try to move the lighter, it is already as dangerous as it can be, and they need to be extremely careful for the very first time they move at all.
One COULD argue that a safer way to learn how to handle a sword, is to start with the sword. The student does not move around, they do not perform any forms, they do not move the sword around to feel its weight, they do nothing but hold the sword, and pay attention to it. THen, they make tiny little motions, they move their body ever so slightly, they move their feet to start learning how to move their feet while paying full attention to the sword. The sword is so extremely dangerous that they do not try to do anything other than hold the sword in front of them in full view, and try to be aware of their body.
::::edit:: another parallel is handling guns. You do not take students, and before handing them their first gun train them for weeks and weeks to make the trigger pulling motion. This would result in negligent discharges. Instead, you do not train them to aim down their hands, you do not train them to pull trigger motion. You impress upon them the extreme danger of guns, and you train them to first to make sure they DO NOT TOUCH THE TRIGGER, and then you train them to make sure the safety is on. They are NEVER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE TO TOUCH THE TRIGGER. Then, only once they are in full control of the gun, fully familiar with when it is unloaded and impossible to fire, do you go to a place that a loaded weapon can be handled, and have them begin to learn about how to make sure the gun is always pointed down range, how you never put your finger on the trigger until it is time to shoot, how you frequently check the safety to make sure it remains in safe mode, etc. The student NEVER pulls the trigger, until the gun is loaded, pointed at a target, and everyone is confident they are in control of the gun. end of edit::::
So applying this to punches, the student would not practice forms. First the student would make a fist, and then they would begin to make contact with materials and objects around them with their fist, to see how their fist feels, perhaps they would select some harder and softer objects that they are confident will not be damaged by a gentle hit, and then they start testing their fist onto perhaps the couch, perhaps the table, etc. Then the student finds a target they feel they can adequately strike, and begins testing their fist onto it until they can use exert themselves into their fist. If the student practices forms, they will practice the starting motion of the strike, without actually practicing the motion it would take to perform a strike. THey will be perpetually out of position for a capable strike, because at all times they will try to use muscle memory that was developed before they had awareness of the motions a strike requires. Also, they are at risk of hurting their fist, because they will perform a reflexive striking motion without knowing how to handle the energy of the strike. If the student is capable of striking already, then when they begin to practice forms, the motions they perform will be according to the strikes that they are able to produce, and they will prepare for these known strikes instead of simply moving to a posture that roughly approximates a strike posture.
Likewise, with a sword, if the student practice a long series of forms, they will develop a repertoire of reflexive muscle memory before they have attention to the sword. This student is now at risk of causing serious bodily harm to themselves or others, because they will attempt to recall lengthy series of motions that they practiced with something that did not feel like the sword they will use, and was not harmful. If they enter into a high energy pattern of motions, and lose control of the sword, or are not aware of their surroundings, they will not have practice of first being aware of the sword, where it is, what to do to regain awareness of it, and they will move, perhaps reflexively, without being confident that it is a safe motion. If the student starts to fall, they will attempt to regain their balance reflexively, but merely blank out what is going on with the sword, because they have no reflexive memory of handling a live blade. Instead, it was ok for them to move randomly, wildly, or intentionally onto the sword, because it was not a real one, and it is likely they will hit something, someone, or perhaps even themselves. The student who first practiced being aware of the sword, and then never learned a motion until they were aware of the sword for each motion, will always reflexively move in a way that controls the sword, brings the sword under control, and is aware of the surroundings that the sword must not interact with. Also, when they learn forms, rather than learning muscle memory (spinal memory is more appropriate, spinal memory is the root of reflex) that is roughly similar to a striking posture, they will be aware of the posture it will require to strike, and they will learn the form using known preparative postures, and striking motions that they have experienced cutting with. Their forms will be effective from the first day they learn them, and they will always learn them is such a way that the first thought on their mind at all times is the risk of the blade, because at all times during practice, the most important thing was to be aware of the risk of the sword. Only once enough time has passed for them to be able to practice using dummy swords while still being able to be aware of it as though it were so dangerous, would they move from using the sword, to using a dummy sword.
having said all of this, one thing is true. Very often, if not almost always, the student will try to begin learning swordsmanship without owning a sword. They will attend classes to learn martial arts without actually owning a sword, and this will be the norm, the publicly acceptable way in every region, and if classes are the intent, the more affordable way to take the class. This person will potentially advance very far down the learning curve of forms before they have the opportunity to possess a real sword. While it is true that it is possible to achieve mastery in this way, perhaps this still is the less desirable way to approach mastery, and it would actually be more desirable to start with merely encountering a sword, and learning how to safely hold it without performing any martial arts at all. In this case, this person would be at a severe disadvantage, because they will learn out of order. They will learn master level martial arts before they learn rudimentary handling. They will need to relearn everything they have ever learned as they acquire rudimentary handling skills. This would not be the way to begin military training, it would simply be a way try and gain some advantage over others for when military training becomes available, so that military training is more valuable. They would still be at the very beginning when they first handle a sword.
|
|
tera
Moderator
Posts: 1,435
|
Post by tera on Jul 5, 2021 17:33:51 GMT
I respectfully question the lighter and firearm analogies as achieving a safe sword cut is more complex than button presses. I know that is an oversimplification of your analogies, and don't mean offense, but I think it is sufficient to make them not quite fit.
I do like the punching analogy, though. In both strikes and sword work your entire body is involved and there are important biomechanical details (such as how to arrange the fingers and thumb into a fist, what part of the hand is the desired striking surface, and how to align the joints on impact to minimize risk of self-injury). In both cases, it makes sense to start slow and practice moving the arms and body through the proper arcs. Where are my elbows through the arc of a punch/cut? This sort of thing is easily overlooked if you try to start fast. In the case of the sword, by all means use a bokken, they are fairly inexpensive and simulate sword shape and weight well. In punching, you'll initially need some sort of safe, soft target when you are ready to begin putting energy into it. So, again, some basic equipment makes sense in both cases. Ask anyone who practiced a martial art that drilled full-speed punches and kicks into their kata how their knees and elbows are doing later in life. Without a suitable target to absorb the impact you have to either pull your punch (which, as you point out isn't training to REALLY punch) or essentially dry-fire a bow, which in this case constitutes your precious tendons. The latter can lead to early retirement from martial practice, life-long complications, or surgery.
I knew a fellow who trained in a system I won't name that had him drill kicking a wooden pole full-strength with his shins. When our body is damaged, it repairs itself. This kind of damage resulted in thicker than normal bones. However, it also resulted in highly irregular bone shape that causes him trouble walking now, kneeling is painful, and standing up laborious. He won many competitions in his day, but now lives with the consequences.
Another thing I like about your punch analogy is the issue of accuracy. Watch some group of people practicing (pick your flavor) of martial-art turned exercise class. When they punch, where do their fists go? Usually you will see great inconsistency in placement not just between class members, but between punches from the same individual. Now, if they were taught form first before jumping into the exercise class, they would know how to deliver a punch to the same, desired location consistently. The same holds true with sword cuts. Starting slow with an emphasis on form improves accuracy.
But why would accuracy matter if the goal is just to have fun? Well, lets say you want to dive in to learning a Wing Chun solo and bought yourself a cheap 12 inch by 12 inch target bag. If you haven't been well trained on the body and arm position during a centerline punch, your punches may land inconsistently, and will do so even more as you tire. By trying to "go fast" before drilling form, you'll punch your cement wall behind your target eventually, probably more then once. Even with proper "fist structure" you can break bones here. Heaven help you if you thought "protecting" your thumb inside your rolled up fingers was a "smarter" way to make a fist (yes, I've seen someone do this).
Likewise, returning to sword. We now have both hands involved in aligning the blade and, indeed, the whole body is involved in creating consistent (read:accurate) cuts. This is why many of us recommend learning proper grip, stance, and doing suburi drills. If the blade isn't going where you intended it to go, is that truly safe? Is it even "cool" by any standard when you know a good cut was merely an accident? The danger likewise comes from inaccurate cuts striking unintended targets. You can damage your blade burying it into a wooden stand if you are also scooping while you cut. You can chip or break it if you strike a harder surface poorly. This presents risk to yourself and/or any bystander who may be hit by the helicoptering tip of your broken blade. I will pull in two common sayings from the firearms world regarding misses, "There is no 'return' button on any firearm," and, "there is a lawyer tied to every bullet."
So, I agree with the middle ground of having some basic training implement. With firearms, I often start people on empty airsoft replicas. I'm still all over them about muzzle discipline and trigger finger safety just like I am with live firearms. However, this helps me show them good grip, posture and follow-through without the risk of live rounds. So, here too, a training tool like a bokken can be helpful. You can even get bokken with plastic saya for less than $70 some places.
Now, having said that, I don't think practicing body alignment without a tool is worthless. As shown in the video, you can develop good habits for free, and without the extra weight of a bokken you will be able to drill more repetitions before tiring. There is value in simplifying the "cut" down into practicing good habits with different parts of the body individually at first, then adding it together. Taking it on all at once can be overwhelming and, without trained supervision, you won't notice a lot of easily fixable errors. If you still want to hold something, a short, narrow wooden dowel or piece of PVC can help you practice good grip as you get the body moving as it needs to. Chances are something like this is laying around the house. Even a feather duster is fine.
So, again, I believe both opinions are valid, but perhaps there is wisdom somewhere in between.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2021 18:02:55 GMT
I'm ready to enter into the flame war. Right at the beginning you make a very common statement. You say do not touch a sharp sword until properly trained. I want to talk about this and some things about it. If a person is going to learn to light a fire, (get it,, flamewar?), they don't practice moving their hand under the sticks for a period of time, perhaps weeks, before they ever hold a flame. Actually, first you introduce the person to a lighter, tell them to be careful, and not to move around while the fire is lit, and then you show them how to work the lighter. Then they practice making the lighter light, and merely being in control of a lit lighter. They first practice paying attention to a dangerous object, and then they don't learn another move until they are prepared to first be aware of the danger of the object. Then when they go to light the fire, they practice trying to start all kinds of things on fire, and likely they just start one little stick or piece of grass and then it goes out. Perhaps they even burn a page of paper and still fail. Eventually they move up in amount until something is over the top enough to light a fire. But, never do they simply make the motions of moving the lighter into position. They don't start moving around until they are already learning how to move the dangerous object. The first time they try to move the lighter, it is already as dangerous as it can be, and they need to be extremely careful for the very first time they move at all. One COULD argue that a safer way to learn how to handle a sword, is to start with the sword. The student does not move around, they do not perform any forms, they do not move the sword around to feel its weight, they do nothing but hold the sword, and pay attention to it. THen, they make tiny little motions, they move their body ever so slightly, they move their feet to start learning how to move their feet while paying full attention to the sword. The sword is so extremely dangerous that they do not try to do anything other than hold the sword in front of them in full view, and try to be aware of their body. ::::edit:: another parallel is handling guns. You do not take students, and before handing them their first gun train them for weeks and weeks to make the trigger pulling motion. This would result in negligent discharges. Instead, you do not train them to aim down their hands, you do not train them to pull trigger motion. You impress upon them the extreme danger of guns, and you train them to first to make sure they DO NOT TOUCH THE TRIGGER, and then you train them to make sure the safety is on. They are NEVER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE TO TOUCH THE TRIGGER. Then, only once they are in full control of the gun, fully familiar with when it is unloaded and impossible to fire, do you go to a place that a loaded weapon can be handled, and have them begin to learn about how to make sure the gun is always pointed down range, how you never put your finger on the trigger until it is time to shoot, how you frequently check the safety to make sure it remains in safe mode, etc. The student NEVER pulls the trigger, until the gun is loaded, pointed at a target, and everyone is confident they are in control of the gun. end of edit:::: So applying this to punches, the student would not practice forms. First the student would make a fist, and then they would begin to make contact with materials and objects around them with their fist, to see how their fist feels, perhaps they would select some harder and softer objects that they are confident will not be damaged by a gentle hit, and then they start testing their fist onto perhaps the couch, perhaps the table, etc. Then the student finds a target they feel they can adequately strike, and begins testing their fist onto it until they can use exert themselves into their fist. If the student practices forms, they will practice the starting motion of the strike, without actually practicing the motion it would take to perform a strike. THey will be perpetually out of position for a capable strike, because at all times they will try to use muscle memory that was developed before they had awareness of the motions a strike requires. Also, they are at risk of hurting their fist, because they will perform a reflexive striking motion without knowing how to handle the energy of the strike. If the student is capable of striking already, then when they begin to practice forms, the motions they perform will be according to the strikes that they are able to produce, and they will prepare for these known strikes instead of simply moving to a posture that roughly approximates a strike posture. Likewise, with a sword, if the student practice a long series of forms, they will develop a repertoire of reflexive muscle memory before they have attention to the sword. This student is now at risk of causing serious bodily harm to themselves or others, because they will attempt to recall lengthy series of motions that they practiced with something that did not feel like the sword they will use, and was not harmful. If they enter into a high energy pattern of motions, and lose control of the sword, or are not aware of their surroundings, they will not have practice of first being aware of the sword, where it is, what to do to regain awareness of it, and they will move, perhaps reflexively, without being confident that it is a safe motion. If the student starts to fall, they will attempt to regain their balance reflexively, but merely blank out what is going on with the sword, because they have no reflexive memory of handling a live blade. Instead, it was ok for them to move randomly, wildly, or intentionally onto the sword, because it was not a real one, and it is likely they will hit something, someone, or perhaps even themselves. The student who first practiced being aware of the sword, and then never learned a motion until they were aware of the sword for each motion, will always reflexively move in a way that controls the sword, brings the sword under control, and is aware of the surroundings that the sword must not interact with. Also, when they learn forms, rather than learning muscle memory (spinal memory is more appropriate, spinal memory is the root of reflex) that is roughly similar to a striking posture, they will be aware of the posture it will require to strike, and they will learn the form using known preparative postures, and striking motions that they have experienced cutting with. Their forms will be effective from the first day they learn them, and they will always learn them is such a way that the first thought on their mind at all times is the risk of the blade, because at all times during practice, the most important thing was to be aware of the risk of the sword. Only once enough time has passed for them to be able to practice using dummy swords while still being able to be aware of it as though it were so dangerous, would they move from using the sword, to using a dummy sword. having said all of this, one thing is true. Very often, if not almost always, the student will try to begin learning swordsmanship without owning a sword. They will attend classes to learn martial arts without actually owning a sword, and this will be the norm, the publicly acceptable way in every region, and if classes are the intent, the more affordable way to take the class. This person will potentially advance very far down the learning curve of forms before they have the opportunity to possess a real sword. While it is true that it is possible to achieve mastery in this way, perhaps this still is the less desirable way to approach mastery, and it would actually be more desirable to start with merely encountering a sword, and learning how to safely hold it without performing any martial arts at all. In this case, this person would be at a severe disadvantage, because they will learn out of order. They will learn master level martial arts before they learn rudimentary handling. They will need to relearn everything they have ever learned as they acquire rudimentary handling skills. This would not be the way to begin military training, it would simply be a way try and gain some advantage over others for when military training becomes available, so that military training is more valuable. They would still be at the very beginning when they first handle a sword. Even in the Roman days, and before that, people trained with wooden weapons first. It's good to develop the muscle memory first. But I'll toss you an olive branch, I didn't practice formally with a sword before cutting with one either (though I did spare a lot with wooden weapons without instruction before this). Many don't. You don't have to, no one is gonna force you to get proper instruction first . But just keep in mind that most who have had proper instruction will frown upon it. That's just how it is. You don't get proper instruction, it's gonna make people a little nervous for your safety or the safety of those around you. I've seen quite a bit of injuries happen to people using swords, even in real life. But you're an adult, you can do what you want. But if you ever find yourself making a thread about the dangers of sword use and showing us an injury, don't blame us if we think "I told you so" We're not trying to disparage you. Plenty of people have the common sense not to get hurt, even without instruction. But a lot of people get hurt even with instruction and every person sent to an ER because of improper sword use will make politicians more likely to put laws in order, regarding sword ownership of it gets out of hand Edit: think of it as a warning label from the community, like a jar of peanuts that say "warning: contains peanuts". Its kind of just mandatory for us to say it to people without instruction. If it bugs you, lie to us lol. Or ignore us. We cant do anything
|
|
|
Post by RufusScorpius on Jul 5, 2021 20:49:12 GMT
If a person is going to learn to light a fire, (get it,, flamewar?), they don't practice moving their hand under the sticks for a period of time, perhaps weeks, before they ever hold a flame. One COULD argue that a safer way to learn how to handle a sword, is to start with the sword. The student does not move around, they do not perform any forms, they do not move the sword around to feel its weight, they do nothing but hold the sword, and pay attention to it. THen, they make tiny little motions, they move their body ever so slightly, they move their feet to start learning how to move their feet while paying full attention to the sword. The sword is so extremely dangerous that they do not try to do anything other than hold the sword in front of them in full view, and try to be aware of their body. ::::edit:: another parallel is handling guns. You do not take students, and before handing them their first gun train them for weeks and weeks to make the trigger pulling motion. end of edit:::: So applying this to punches, the student would not practice forms. First the student would make a fist, and then they would begin to make contact with materials and objects around them with their fist, to see how their fist feels, perhaps they would select some harder and softer objects that they are confident will not be damaged by a gentle hit, and then they start testing their fist onto perhaps the couch, perhaps the table, etc. Likewise, with a sword, if the student practice a long series of forms, they will develop a repertoire of reflexive muscle memory before they have attention to the sword. This student is now at risk of causing serious bodily harm to themselves or others, because they will attempt to recall lengthy series of motions that they practiced with something that did not feel like the sword they will use, and was not harmful. ...They will attend classes to learn martial arts without actually owning a sword, and this will be the norm, the publicly acceptable way in every region, and if classes are the intent, the more affordable way to take the class. Well now, where to begin: A sword is not a lighter. An idiot with a lighter can burn down a forest. The Boy Scouts have a formal training program on how to light a fire. Learning how to wield a sword with little motions is just plain stupid. Yes, I said it. That method is used in exactly ZERO sword training systems across the world. Every culture has rejected that method. ...and I'm done. Not even going to respond to the rest of it. A sword is not an ax, baseball bat, gun, lighter, pointed stick, banana, spoon, fist, fish stick, or any other random object you care to compare it to. I'm in Leverkusen Germany until Friday, after that I will be home in Virginia Beach. I have a bad knee, bad shoulder, and 30lbs overweight and out of shape with a salt and pepper beard that shows my age. I will spar with any self taught swordsman any time you want and we can see which system has speed, accuracy, control, and results - self-taught or teacher taught. I have put my money where my mouth is many times before on this forum and I am not afraid to do it now. As I said at the start of this thread, I believe in "put up or shut up".
|
|
pgandy
Moderator
Senior Forumite
Posts: 10,227
|
Post by pgandy on Jul 6, 2021 16:17:23 GMT
Thanks for the video. It has good points clearly demonstrated. I’m sure some will benefit from it as surely as I’m sure you are going to get more controversy than you planned on. If your challenge is accepted my money is on you. 😁
|
|
|
Post by RufusScorpius on Jul 6, 2021 17:31:12 GMT
Thanks for the video. It has good points clearly demonstrated. I’m sure some will benefit from it as surely as I’m sure you are going to get more controversy than you planned on. If your challenge is accepted my money is on you. 😁 Even if the challenge is accepted and I get wiped on the floor, at least I put my training/theories/ etc to the test in a practical exercise. And controversy? Bring it on. The forum needs a good shake up once in a while.  It will be .... spicey ... 
|
|
|
Post by Murffy on Jul 6, 2021 23:03:16 GMT
I may be getting senile but I didn't see where tsmspace claimed self-taught is better than teacher-taught.
I'm not a katana guy at all, but in the video, I found it interesting that you direct attacks simply by shifting the back of the handle rather than moving the arms to one side or another. Very efficient. I can see how the technique could also be used to feint to one side and quickly attack the other.
|
|
|
Post by RufusScorpius on Jul 7, 2021 17:24:14 GMT
It's not exactly that anybody is saying it's "better" per se, but many times on this forum people have been very adamant that being self taught is as good as having a teacher. That is simply not true. In fact, it goes so far as some on the forum would say that having a "store bought" education of the sword is nothing more than a waste of money and makes a person feel superior to everybody else. That is also not true. Those of us with formal training see the danger inherent in a sharp sword and try to nudge people in a safer direction.
Now, I fully understand that in this day and age using a sword is just a niche hobby. I also am fully aware of the difficulty of finding a teacher, and the expense involved if you do. There is no real harm in reading a book and watching some videos and trying it out for yourself (in fact, I encourage that), just don't do it with a sharp blade. There is a very good reason why, in formal schools, students never touch a live blade for a very, very long time.
To make the same analogy brought up earlier; You would give a 10 year old an airsoft gun because the danger if he does something wrong is fairly low, but nobody in their right mind would give a 10 year old a real gun and not expect something very bad to happen. And for the record, the Army actually does make soldiers go over the trigger pull/hold/breathing routine for weeks on end using simulated guns and other training aids.
|
|
|
Post by RufusScorpius on Jul 7, 2021 17:30:23 GMT
... I'm not a katana guy at all, but in the video, I found it interesting that you direct attacks simply by shifting the back of the handle rather than moving the arms to one side or another. Very efficient. I can see how the technique could also be used to feint to one side and quickly attack the other. That's the secret to it at the end of the day - and anybody can do it. The moves are very basic and easy to learn, but it takes years to actually master. The sword motions are fluid, gentle like a butterfly, but bites like a tiger. When it's done correctly, the sword doesn't matter. You no longer are even thinking of the blade, only the motion of your own hands. It's hard to explain, but when I spar or practice, the sword doesn't exist to me and I'm writing things in the air with my hands and my mind- almost like a wizard casting a spell, so to speak.
|
|
|
Post by tsmspace on Jul 8, 2021 6:33:30 GMT
I may be getting senile but I didn't see where tsmspace claimed self-taught is better than teacher-taught. I'm not a katana guy at all, but in the video, I found it interesting that you direct attacks simply by shifting the back of the handle rather than moving the arms to one side or another. Very efficient. I can see how the technique could also be used to feint to one side and quickly attack the other. I actually never claimed self taught is better. I wasn't talking about self taught, just the order of introduction, and some thoughts about common order of introduction vs. an alternate order of introduction. So, when people learn to drive, for example, they don't get trained to just move their hands in the air. Instead they get told cars are extremely dangerous, do not move the car at all until we very carefully walk you through very gradual steps of learning. Then, they sit behind the wheel, and are allowed to perhaps do nothing more than roll forward and hit the brakes, or perhaps they are allowed to go very slowly around a parking lot. They never practice hard cornering (although children do this, it's not part of driver education) in their minds before getting behind the wheel. High performance driving isn't even considered until a certain level of rudimentary operational experience is acquired. (actually, HIGHWAY driving is not a part of learning until quite far down the confidence path). Today people start with video games, it's true, but they are not going through any sort of forms to practice until they get really advanced in actual handling. (or maybe they are and I don't know that, but my experience is very basic concepts in simulators, and then you don't even consider advanced driving, you start out basically only working through basic navigation and parking with an actual car. ) -- So the parallel with swords would be that the students don't ever go performing attacks under any circumstance. They hold the sword at all, they walk around a room with it, they carry it outside, they just do things like that. Eventually, they don't swing it, but they test the edge with a gentle cutting attempt, maybe some paper slicing, etc.
|
|
|
Post by tsmspace on Jul 8, 2021 6:37:42 GMT
I respectfully question the lighter and firearm analogies as achieving a safe sword cut is more complex than button presses. I know that is an oversimplification of your analogies, and don't mean offense, but I think it is sufficient to make them not quite fit. I do like the punching analogy, though. In both strikes and sword work your entire body is involved and there are important biomechanical details (such as how to arrange the fingers and thumb into a fist, what part of the hand is the desired striking surface, and how to align the joints on impact to minimize risk of self-injury). In both cases, it makes sense to start slow and practice moving the arms and body through the proper arcs. Where are my elbows through the arc of a punch/cut? This sort of thing is easily overlooked if you try to start fast. In the case of the sword, by all means use a bokken, they are fairly inexpensive and simulate sword shape and weight well. In punching, you'll initially need some sort of safe, soft target when you are ready to begin putting energy into it. So, again, some basic equipment makes sense in both cases. Ask anyone who practiced a martial art that drilled full-speed punches and kicks into their kata how their knees and elbows are doing later in life. Without a suitable target to absorb the impact you have to either pull your punch (which, as you point out isn't training to REALLY punch) or essentially dry-fire a bow, which in this case constitutes your precious tendons. The latter can lead to early retirement from martial practice, life-long complications, or surgery. I knew a fellow who trained in a system I won't name that had him drill kicking a wooden pole full-strength with his shins. When our body is damaged, it repairs itself. This kind of damage resulted in thicker than normal bones. However, it also resulted in highly irregular bone shape that causes him trouble walking now, kneeling is painful, and standing up laborious. He won many competitions in his day, but now lives with the consequences. Another thing I like about your punch analogy is the issue of accuracy. Watch some group of people practicing (pick your flavor) of martial-art turned exercise class. When they punch, where do their fists go? Usually you will see great inconsistency in placement not just between class members, but between punches from the same individual. Now, if they were taught form first before jumping into the exercise class, they would know how to deliver a punch to the same, desired location consistently. The same holds true with sword cuts. Starting slow with an emphasis on form improves accuracy. But why would accuracy matter if the goal is just to have fun? Well, lets say you want to dive in to learning a Wing Chun solo and bought yourself a cheap 12 inch by 12 inch target bag. If you haven't been well trained on the body and arm position during a centerline punch, your punches may land inconsistently, and will do so even more as you tire. By trying to "go fast" before drilling form, you'll punch your cement wall behind your target eventually, probably more then once. Even with proper "fist structure" you can break bones here. Heaven help you if you thought "protecting" your thumb inside your rolled up fingers was a "smarter" way to make a fist (yes, I've seen someone do this). Likewise, returning to sword. We now have both hands involved in aligning the blade and, indeed, the whole body is involved in creating consistent (read:accurate) cuts. This is why many of us recommend learning proper grip, stance, and doing suburi drills. If the blade isn't going where you intended it to go, is that truly safe? Is it even "cool" by any standard when you know a good cut was merely an accident? The danger likewise comes from inaccurate cuts striking unintended targets. You can damage your blade burying it into a wooden stand if you are also scooping while you cut. You can chip or break it if you strike a harder surface poorly. This presents risk to yourself and/or any bystander who may be hit by the helicoptering tip of your broken blade. I will pull in two common sayings from the firearms world regarding misses, "There is no 'return' button on any firearm," and, "there is a lawyer tied to every bullet." So, I agree with the middle ground of having some basic training implement. With firearms, I often start people on empty airsoft replicas. I'm still all over them about muzzle discipline and trigger finger safety just like I am with live firearms. However, this helps me show them good grip, posture and follow-through without the risk of live rounds. So, here too, a training tool like a bokken can be helpful. You can even get bokken with plastic saya for less than $70 some places. Now, having said that, I don't think practicing body alignment without a tool is worthless. As shown in the video, you can develop good habits for free, and without the extra weight of a bokken you will be able to drill more repetitions before tiring. There is value in simplifying the "cut" down into practicing good habits with different parts of the body individually at first, then adding it together. Taking it on all at once can be overwhelming and, without trained supervision, you won't notice a lot of easily fixable errors. If you still want to hold something, a short, narrow wooden dowel or piece of PVC can help you practice good grip as you get the body moving as it needs to. Chances are something like this is laying around the house. Even a feather duster is fine. So, again, I believe both opinions are valid, but perhaps there is wisdom somewhere in between. it's always hard with analogies, because if I have some mental framework or limitations on where I feel the analogy is adequate, someone else will always approach the analogy from an angle where they see it's different. So anyway you don't need to tiptoe around that one with me. as for practicing with wood sticks and without a sword,, these things are just as valuable as any school will suggest, but generally a natural progression will take you to this after a certain amount of experience with actual handling. So, going back to the self taught student from another commenter, the self taught student WILL eventually go around trying to use a wooden stand in, or just their hands, it will be something that everyone progresses to,,, but when they do this there will already be a lot they understand about their posture that someone just learning forms without practical handling experience will not. The posture of operating a sword is very different from simply moving in a similar fashion.
|
|
|
Post by treeslicer on Jul 12, 2021 3:29:32 GMT
Now, let the comment flames begin! It's a decently crafted training video. I liked the absence of technical Japanese and rei at this level of practical instruction, get them moving correctly first.
If you're starting your own ryu, buy yourself a more impressive "soke suit".
|
|
|
Post by RufusScorpius on Jul 12, 2021 15:34:29 GMT
Good idea, treeslicer. I should get a better set of clothes. I was thinking about starting a school in the local shopping mall and a nice set of impressive duds is just the thing to make people think that I know what I'm doing.  Or I could say that I'm trying to be humble like a first time student because in all the years of training I've only learned that I know nothing. I'll let you pick which one.
|
|
|
Post by RufusScorpius on Jul 12, 2021 15:39:07 GMT
... the self taught student WILL eventually go around trying to use a wooden stand in, or just their hands, it will be something that everyone progresses to,,, but when they do this there will already be a lot they understand about their posture that someone just learning forms without practical handling experience will not. The posture of operating a sword is very different from simply moving in a similar fashion. How will they know this without a teacher? How will they know what "progression" is without a guideline or measurable standard against which they can compare their progress? If they only compare their progress to themselves, then HOW will they know when they have moved forward, or even backwards? How will a self-taught student even know that they don't know?
|
|
|
Post by treeslicer on Jul 12, 2021 17:55:09 GMT
Good idea, treeslicer. I should get a better set of clothes. I was thinking about starting a school in the local shopping mall and a nice set of impressive duds is just the thing to make people think that I know what I'm doing.  Or I could say that I'm trying to be humble like a first time student because in all the years of training I've only learned that I know nothing. I'll let you pick which one. Choose the middle path, a good but unadorned iaido set in dark indigo cotton, that's obviously seen the inside of a washing machine before, and with a haori to give a sense of balanced gravity without being too weighty (there's a pun in there, too  ).
|
|
|
Post by RufusScorpius on Jul 12, 2021 19:17:33 GMT
Well ok then. I just ordered a black w/gold stripe short kimono with traditional grey (thin black/white stripe) hakama. On sale of course, with a coupon. It will be the new scorpion look for "official" teaching events. More or less (mostly less I would think). No haori yet, I couldn't find a deal that I liked just yet. I'll pick one up in a few weeks, no hurry on that.
|
|
|
Post by bokuto on Jul 21, 2021 15:01:56 GMT
|
|