|
Post by septofclansinclair on Jun 11, 2008 18:25:55 GMT
Code - I simply took some sandpaper (I think 200 grit) and rubbed the leather gently. This takes away the shine, but also makes it quite much easier to handle. That help?
|
|
|
Post by code on Jun 11, 2008 18:31:19 GMT
Yeah thanks, I figured it was something like that, I just haven't ever heard that term used before I'll definitely be doing that so it doesn't feel like its going to slip out of my hands hehe
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2008 20:11:39 GMT
Damn scrawny-looking tang.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2008 21:15:10 GMT
thats what i was thinking to.....but i mean for light usage eh...
id personally just epoxy it on there so it permanent
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2008 23:22:08 GMT
It is skinny, but at least it's radiused at the shoulder/tang transition and it doesn't look like the threads are welded on (kinda hard to tell exactly). So it's got 2 out of three things going for it, apparently. I'd like to see them increase the width by at least 50% (if not more). Thanks for the pics! P.S. As long as we're talking Strongblade, will somebody please get one of these (tempered model) www.strongblade.com/prod/sba-dreadwindrapier.html so I can read a review! ;D I really dig the look of it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2008 1:39:03 GMT
It's on my list krieg Just getting the money together, too many things I want and not enough money, rrrr!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2008 2:27:45 GMT
same here everyday one gets added to the list...
|
|
|
Post by septofclansinclair on Jun 12, 2008 15:49:34 GMT
The tang is a bit shorter than I expected, but the pommel screws on good and tight. Before and after cutting it exhibited no signs of failing - I don't think it's unusually scrawny, especially compared to some windlass models that I own. I'd say it's comparable to other swords in this price bracket.
My "wish list" grew so much that I had to chuck it out, all it was doing was making me miserable!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2008 16:03:33 GMT
Hey everybody!
This is Roberto, from Strongblade. Just wanted to answer a couple of comments that I read. The first is about the tang on the Warspike. Just wanted to confirm that it is definitely not a welded tang. The entire blade and tang is made from one piece of metal. I appreciate the comments on the width of the tang, and I would certainly have our designers make it thicker if it would make a difference, but I don't think the width is a problem. If the tang were made thicker, the grip would have to be thinner, which would make the grip a little fragile and prone to cracking. The current width of the tang is proportionally correct for the width of the blade, and provides strength as well as flexibility to the sword.
The comments ont he last review about the streaks on the finish are very surprising to me as we pride ourselves on sending out the cleanest, best polished swords on the market. We would be happy to take back your sword and run it through our buffers again if you would like. It is unacceptable to us that someone should receive a sword in that condition. Please e-mail me directly - rrodriguez@strongblade.com and we'll send out a call tag for it.
We should be getting a few more tempered versions of our sword in July. I think the Deathbringer, the Crusader, and the Coustille Dagger are definitely arriving, and possibly a few others. I'll post an update when they arrive.
Best regards,
Roberto Rodriguez Strongblade
|
|
|
Post by Brendan Olszowy on Jun 12, 2008 16:56:49 GMT
I don't think the tang is scrawny compared to an angus trim. However compared to the Albion shown on the How It's Made clip, or the tangs I use on my swords - it is. Though I'm sure it's sufficient. Though looking at the width of the grip vs the tang I'd say theres a stack of room for widening the tang.
It looks like the threaded section is welded on. There seems to be some threads showing about half an inch after the tang starts to thicken. That guard is very messy, it needs some filing. I guess you get what you pay for, bottom line.
The tang width can be seen at 3.50 as can the grip thickness either side of the tang
|
|
|
Post by code on Jun 12, 2008 17:45:57 GMT
The tang did not seem to be welded as it appears to be in the picture. It's somewhat uneven in places and I think thats whats fooling you. It would have been easier to see if I had cleaned up the rust but I didn't want to do that in case it messed up the fit. (I've never pulled a sword apart before) Roberto, thanks for replying, the finish on the blade didn't bother me that much, it was just a bit surprising as I knew that you guys checked every blade before shipping. I'll still drop you a line and we'll work something out The messy guard was a lot worse then the finish in my opinion, filing it down would just make the gap between the guard and the blade even more noticeable. It probably wouldn't hurt to make the tang a bit thicker (there is enough room), though I'm sure its adequate as it is. I haven't really abused the sword yet so I don't know On another note, my review might sound a bit negative as I was trying not to repeat what had already been said and left out most of the good points because of this. Don't let this fool anybody though, I'm very happy with the warspike, as seen in the final score
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2008 21:05:55 GMT
Please see my post above. We do not use welded tangs on our swords. The tang on the Warspike is not welded. It is one continuous piece of metal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2008 7:33:17 GMT
Thanks for the info, Roberto. Btw, check out Fatecaller's new Strongblade review for a clearer pic of a Strongblade tang. No welds.
|
|
|
Post by hotspur on Jun 15, 2008 9:43:57 GMT
Great review! This sword is also catching my eye--if this is well executed, then I'm sold! www.strongblade.com/prod/sba-irishtwohander.htmledit: hmmm on second thought that looks a LOT like a similar windlass that used to be offered for the same price. Darn! edit the edit: It says that it's a strongblade blade after all. But it also says this: Huge muscles and battle-rage not included. Strongblade does not recommend trying to slay giant, maurauding killer water dragons with this weapon." Darn again! Anyhow great review, intriguing new company! Karma towards all who made the review! I really don't mean to detract from the review but do notice a similarity between the two reviewed thus far and the construction methods seen on Darksword products shown in the past. I don't think it likely we'll see the inside of Strongblade's workshops any time soon either. From Strongblade's FAQ The swords look like they may well be worth consideration for those on a budget. I also think it is great that retailers are relating public feedback to manufacturers. Cheers Hotspur; always good to see feedback on anything that is coming out
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2008 2:43:18 GMT
The tang and nut+pommel arrangement are decidedly Darkswordesque. Are you thinking they may come from the same place, Hotspur, or simply noting the likeness? I'm not disagreeing with the possibility of a common ancestry, I'm just curious.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2008 19:47:24 GMT
Hi, Roberto again. We have our own manufacturer. We have nothing to do with Darksword. Our manufacturer does not make swords for Darksword. These are Strongblade exclusives. Please let me know if you have any other questions about our manufacturer. We'd be happy to confirm or deny any ideas you may have before posting them to avoid rumors. Cheers! Roberto strongblade www.strongblade.com
|
|