|
Post by CivilSavage on Nov 6, 2010 23:15:06 GMT
I'd by the A&A, I know that it's several hundred more but the difference of comparison will be obvious. Or...for a little less you could have Craig take their training sidesword and mount a sharp blade on it? Or just by a Windlass.
|
|
|
Post by johnapsega on Nov 7, 2010 23:32:06 GMT
I dont know about others but for myself getting an A&A is pretty much out of the question. It takes long enough to get 200$ mowing peoples yards but another several hundred after that would easily take me over a year. However I agree with you about buying the windlass. I would rather not risk cutting with a handle thats mostly hollow. Im really considering getting the Munich.
|
|
|
Post by chuckinohio on Nov 9, 2010 22:48:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by johnapsega on Nov 10, 2010 16:07:16 GMT
Whats the difference between the Rheinfelden and the Munich
|
|
|
Post by chuckinohio on Nov 12, 2010 14:19:20 GMT
Judging from Daves comments, not a lot besides the hilt construction. The Munich being balanced like he describes leaves only the overall weight being different. Going from his comments on how the Munich handles, I would choose the Munich over the Hanwei due to it having more weight. The Hanwei feels almost too light for my tastes.
|
|
|
Post by johnapsega on Nov 12, 2010 14:35:42 GMT
I think that I agree with you the Munich deffinatly justwent up to the top 3 on my list. Knowing my luck though just when I go to buy it its going to get discontinued lol.
|
|
|
Post by Reflingar on Jan 3, 2011 20:58:24 GMT
For those interested: the Munich is on the Museum Replicas Deal of the Day at 132.50$
|
|
|
Post by Kilted Cossack on Jan 4, 2011 4:02:22 GMT
What a fortuitous post to stumble over! The Windlass Munich sword, and A&A's version, have long fascinated me. It falls into a type of sword that fascinates me: more than a small sword, less than a rapier, a complex hilted riding sword (or as I think of it sometimes, a town sword). Dave, I've got a lot of respect for your understanding of swords, so your commentary on the Windlass is a big plus! It's funny, just the other day I was thinking that Windlass had fallen completely out of the running, and that I was, for the forseeable future, going to be a Hanwei/Tinker or Valiant/Trim customer. But there it is: a well reviewed Windlass in a format I really like.
|
|
|
Post by JohnE on Jan 4, 2011 4:31:30 GMT
Crud, crud, crud. I've had my eye on the Munich for some time and that's a really good deal, but I'm broke. *pout*
|
|
|
Post by Reflingar on Jan 4, 2011 5:56:31 GMT
I resisted the temptation as well...hope there will be another good deal on this one, at a time when I can actually envision buying it...oh well...
|
|
|
Post by johnapsega on Jan 4, 2011 20:07:32 GMT
wow how did I miss that post if I had known about that I would have gone for it when it was the deal of the day.
|
|
|
Post by Reflingar on Jan 4, 2011 20:17:39 GMT
Ya, I kind of regret my good sense of yesterday now...hopefully, it will be back in special someday or in closeout or on KOA...sigh
|
|
|
Post by johnapsega on Jan 4, 2011 20:36:52 GMT
Yea me to I really do love that sword.
|
|
|
Post by Kilted Cossack on Jan 6, 2011 20:53:00 GMT
Here's an appropriate discussion of the Windlass Munich sword from "the serious guys" at MyArmoury.com: www.myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic ... sc&start=0 Please to note: By referring to them as "the serious guys" I'm not disparaging them in any way, it's just that MyArmoury seems to take historical accuracy quite seriously. Anyway----I thought it was interesting and deserved broader dissemination.
|
|
|
Post by johnapsega on Jan 6, 2011 22:44:38 GMT
Thank you for the link, I found it very useful. The more and more I read about this then the more I want one lol.
|
|
|
Post by chuckinohio on Jan 9, 2011 11:44:15 GMT
The link to the MA thread was interesting and shed some more historical light on the subject.
You were entirely right calling them the SERIOUS GUYS over there, they are a serious bunch when it comes to discussing facts, and tend to dispell fallacies pretty quickly. A great bunch, and sharper than tacks.
|
|
|
Post by Kilted Cossack on Jan 9, 2011 13:45:27 GMT
Chuck: I agree! While I, myself, am probably too chatty to fit in with them, I profit greatly from their informed, historical approach to cold arms.
|
|