KC Medieval war sword. A second opinion.
Feb 27, 2008 20:37:21 GMT
Post by YlliwCir on Feb 27, 2008 20:37:21 GMT
Kris Cutlery Medieval War Sword. Reviewed by Richard Williams. USA
I have been a fan of Kris Cutlery for a while and I was excited to see this medieval sword being offered.
I decided I had to have one. This sword has already been reviewed by forumite vayduong here;
/index.cgi?board=swordreviews&action=display&thread=1202373238&page=1
I thought I'd add my two cents also.
Here is the vendor discription;
Medieval War Sword. The need for heavier and longer guard sowrds were developed during the 13th-14th century
in Europe. The tempered blade is 33" long, 1 7/8 " wide, 1/4"+ thick at the base and is made of 5160 steel.
Crossguard has a diamond cross section and is 7 1/2 " long. The 5 3/8 " grip has a cord wrap lacquered black
and tapers towards the end. For counter balance, a wheel pommel is pinned at the end of the handle.
Balance point is 5" from the guard. Wt. 3 lbs. Supplied with black leather scabbard. (ship weight is 6 lbs) $295
I concur to the stats as stated. I will add that there is a slight distal taper. It arrived very sharp, cutting paper easily. The blade has just the right amount of flex in my opinion, ShooterMikes whippy test showed about an inch of waver, a definite stiffy. The scabbard is not worth noting.
In hand;
There was some black tar like substance around the tang peen, you can see some remnants of it. There was also
a bit on the bottom of the pommel and bit on the blade. I removed it with some elbow grease afore I decided to
review. Annoying but not a big issue.
I like this type sword. A simple design diamond cross section with no fuller is a favorite of mine.
Dry handling this sword felt lighter than the stated weight to me tho plenty of blade presence.
Now the fun part;
This sword shines as a cutter and I was supprized how well it thrusted. I like it a lot.
To sum up;
Historical accuracy- This was discussed here;
/index.cgi?board=euromedieval&action=display&thread=1201602727&page=1
Fit and finish- The fittings remained tight through out testing. I give the finish bad marks for arriving with the tar like substance on it. Bad QC.
Handling- I give it an A. I like the balance and it cuts easily.
Stuctural integrity- Everything is solid so far. Time will tell.
Value for money- I thought it a bit pricey for not having a decent scabbard.
In conclusion I find this to be a very good cutting sword. Anyone wanting a good beater might find this one fits the bill.
I have been a fan of Kris Cutlery for a while and I was excited to see this medieval sword being offered.
I decided I had to have one. This sword has already been reviewed by forumite vayduong here;
/index.cgi?board=swordreviews&action=display&thread=1202373238&page=1
I thought I'd add my two cents also.
Here is the vendor discription;
Medieval War Sword. The need for heavier and longer guard sowrds were developed during the 13th-14th century
in Europe. The tempered blade is 33" long, 1 7/8 " wide, 1/4"+ thick at the base and is made of 5160 steel.
Crossguard has a diamond cross section and is 7 1/2 " long. The 5 3/8 " grip has a cord wrap lacquered black
and tapers towards the end. For counter balance, a wheel pommel is pinned at the end of the handle.
Balance point is 5" from the guard. Wt. 3 lbs. Supplied with black leather scabbard. (ship weight is 6 lbs) $295
I concur to the stats as stated. I will add that there is a slight distal taper. It arrived very sharp, cutting paper easily. The blade has just the right amount of flex in my opinion, ShooterMikes whippy test showed about an inch of waver, a definite stiffy. The scabbard is not worth noting.
In hand;
There was some black tar like substance around the tang peen, you can see some remnants of it. There was also
a bit on the bottom of the pommel and bit on the blade. I removed it with some elbow grease afore I decided to
review. Annoying but not a big issue.
I like this type sword. A simple design diamond cross section with no fuller is a favorite of mine.
Dry handling this sword felt lighter than the stated weight to me tho plenty of blade presence.
Now the fun part;
This sword shines as a cutter and I was supprized how well it thrusted. I like it a lot.
To sum up;
Historical accuracy- This was discussed here;
/index.cgi?board=euromedieval&action=display&thread=1201602727&page=1
Fit and finish- The fittings remained tight through out testing. I give the finish bad marks for arriving with the tar like substance on it. Bad QC.
Handling- I give it an A. I like the balance and it cuts easily.
Stuctural integrity- Everything is solid so far. Time will tell.
Value for money- I thought it a bit pricey for not having a decent scabbard.
In conclusion I find this to be a very good cutting sword. Anyone wanting a good beater might find this one fits the bill.