Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2009 0:02:30 GMT
I am considering purchasing my first Gen2 sword. I don't have on in my collection and would like to give one of their products the once over. My collection is extensive already, but I need a good arming sword; something short, fast, and easily worn in crowds at period events. This is to be worn when I am not carrying a two-hander/hand-and-a-half so that I am carrying something more than a dagger, but less than a full sword.
I have came to a decision between the Knightly Riding and the Henry V. I have read all the reviews and information, as well as watched all the videos. I am now at an impass. Either one is rated well for its price point and most of the problems in earlier models have been corrected. Naturally, I would be doing the whole Odingaard bluing and grip treatment to improve the appearance even more.
So, which one would you choose between these two Gen 2 models?
|
|
|
Post by kidcasanova on Apr 13, 2009 0:14:39 GMT
I chose the Henry V, as I like that blade type and the general aesthetics of that sword over the Knightly Riding sword. However, the Knightly Riding would be more easily carried in crowds. Either one would be a good call, as they both have their strengths.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2009 1:53:27 GMT
Both would serve your purposes, but I think the Henry V is nicer aesthetically, and a better base for adding the customizations you have in mind imo...althought, even if kind of short, I see the Henry as a full sword...and I think the knightly riding sword fits the "more than a dagger, less than full sword" better...but I, myself, would (and will, eventually) go for the Henry. I'll be interested to see pics of your customizations on it, whatever one you choose to pick up...
edit: typo
|
|
|
Post by dand on Apr 13, 2009 1:57:20 GMT
I think that the Henry V is nicer aesthetically....and I think it might be an easy choice as I don't believe that the Riding sword has been released yet. Dan
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2009 1:59:48 GMT
Decisions, decisions. I just don't know. I have resorted to showing my dog pictures to see which one he sniffs first...lol.
Right now, I am leaning strongly toward the Riding sword, simply due to its compact size and it still being a capable cutter (as in Mike's video). Also, I am not convinced the tip issue has been 100% worked out on the Henry.
Customizing would hold on either one, I can work with either, so its not really a big deal...
I also looked at the Windlass Type VI(X) before for this purpose, but leaned away for two reasons: One, its a full sized sword for the most part and two, I own and have owned ALOT of Windlass swords already - but no Gen 2.
|
|
|
Post by ShooterMike on Apr 13, 2009 2:13:11 GMT
I did reviews on the prototypes of both those swords, and my recommendation is also for the Henry V. The little riding sword is OK, but still has the standard Gen2 Guard and pommel. IMO the Henry V is much more historic in appearance and just "speaks out in a crowd."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2009 8:59:41 GMT
Thanks for the input on this thus far. I can see that the Henry gains favor over the Riding Sword in the opinion of the forum. I do a little more pondering and let this thread run a bit before coming to a final decision! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2009 12:53:39 GMT
I never liked the riding sword. It's fittings look unbalanced with the blade, like they should be on a full sized sword, not a short sword. It's just not fine and elegant looking like the original short swords were and should be.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2009 12:57:33 GMT
Btw, Windlass Type (X)IV is shorter that Henry V.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2009 13:03:20 GMT
For my part, I'd choose the Henry- as others have said, it is more aesthetically pleasing; I prefer it over the plain riding sword. Not a bad choice for a Gen2 sword.
|
|
|
Post by shadowhowler on Apr 13, 2009 13:19:04 GMT
Btw, Windlass Type (X)IV is shorter that Henry V. Indeed, and is a very light and well balanced sword to boot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2009 9:29:24 GMT
Ok, I came to a decision.
The winner is...the Windlass Type XIV! I just ordered it from KoA.
WTF? Right?
I read and did alot more research and found that the Windlass is the better sword for my purpose. Of couse, I got a couple PMs as well that helped me make the decision. I'd like to give one a try before Windlass discontinues it - as they do with their best models. Though I have a few Windlasses, I don't have any bad ones - and at it's price point - it seems a hell of a deal and suits my needs perfectly.
All is not lost though in this: Gen 2 will get some of my bread - I will be ordering the Gen II Riding Sword from AoV in the next couple weeks because I would just like to see how I could tweek it. It's a unique little sword which will look good once I make some modifications and should perform like a tuned gladius. I can't bite on the Henry yet until I am absolutely sure that the tip issues have been resolved - some people say they have, others say they have not. I figure I can wait and see. Plus, at the price of the Henry - I am approaching my cost for a VA Signature and I am anticipating trying out the Bristol and Krieg over the next few months once the reviews roll in.
Thanks for the input and the PM links. It's all good. I will post a review of the modified Riding Sword once I get it within the month!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2009 22:04:11 GMT
Looking forward seeing the modifications on those two!
|
|
|
Post by shadowhowler on Apr 14, 2009 22:27:08 GMT
I think you'll be happy with the Windlass... I found it to be a very light, lively blade... just a bit borring in the scabbard, grip, fittings... and you can address that no problem. It's a blank slate waiting to be altered.
|
|