|
Post by 28shadow on May 21, 2018 1:17:37 GMT
First of all, is the plural form of Gladius "Gladi"? Second question, are Deepeeka worth purchasing as decent representations of the design? I know most things I've handled or owned from Deepeeka have been trash, but I've heard the ancient era stuff can be OK. I know rather little about the sword design besides the obvious that most people know. A few examples shown at KOA: Legionary Mainz
FulhamSpatha (not a gladius, but a cool looking piece that Dave K. says is OK)Fulham #2Really just testing the waters here. My experience with the Gladius design begins and ends with the CS Gladius Machete.
|
|
|
Post by 28shadow on May 21, 2018 1:23:05 GMT
Also, although I asked for a decent representation of the design, I'm OK if something isn't 100% accurate but is still a good, functional sword. Something I'm quite aware Deepeeka does not often have associated with it.
|
|
|
Post by Timo Nieminen on May 21, 2018 1:40:38 GMT
"Gladii" is the Latin plural, and is OK in English. "Gladiuses" is also used in English. The right Deepeeka models are OK as far as design goes. As far as metallurgy goes, they're typically better than historical - even if the heat treatment is on the soft side (or the blades aren't even hardened). But they're still made by Deepeeka, so made cheaply, and maybe fit and finish suffer. The models you link are OK. Some models are not so good: www.kultofathena.com/product.asp?item=AH4211&name=Roman+Bone+Handled+Pompeii+GladiusWeight and grip length are a good way to weed out the bad ones. If it isn't well under 2lb (maybe look for 1lb 6oz to 1lb 12oz for a gladius) and with grip length under 4", avoid. Look at blade thickness. You could compare the blade thicknesses, weights, and grip lengths of the various Deepeeka models with, e.g., Albion's, which are good for thickness, weight, and grip length.
|
|