Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2007 5:13:15 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2007 14:12:09 GMT
Not my style, But a very nice looking sword. The guard is nice and the blade looks hefty, perfect for a swing while riding, the deep curve of the blade makes for an even deeper cut. Yikes
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2007 22:44:09 GMT
That beefy looking blade was another thing that appealed to me, aside from the great looking guard. A little sharpening, and that baby shold make a fierce cutter, and should be plenty stiff for thrusting, too. My only concern with an all metal hilt is that it may be slippery, but I guess a good glove would solve that.
|
|
|
Post by rammstein on Apr 10, 2007 22:47:36 GMT
awesome blade but I don't like the hilt for some reason...Too flashy...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2007 22:59:11 GMT
awesome blade but I don't like the hilt for some reason...Too flashy... It certainly is shiny, but If I got one I'd tarnish the whole hilt right off like Grayson Brown's Windlass Hanger on myArmoury. I love the look of that one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2007 2:26:14 GMT
Being somewhat saberite myself i found this, www.by-the-sword.com/acatalog/images/ah-3409.JPGIt is quite exquisite and i haven't seen a saber with such a lovely uniform curve which would make it very very effective with saber combat styles. It is from deepeeka though which always gives me pause for thought. Just thought i would share it, hope i am not hijacking.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2007 2:46:14 GMT
Nice! The 1829 French army saber. That is a slick sword. I'm still suspicious enough of Deepeeka quality that I'd like to see Windlass do a version of that sword. The main problem with Deepeeka seems to be their often dodgy heat treat. Still, that is a classic saber (I didn't even realize that Deepeeka made this model of sword until your post, so thank you).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2007 4:54:48 GMT
You're welcome, it really is a slick sword, wonder if we can petition windlass to make this sword? I really like the extreme curvature and what stops me from getting this one is that considering deepeeka's quality i can't imagine how good the proper heat treat would be. I imagine it would need to be a 60/40 heat treat like on a katana. 60 on the cutting edge and 40 on the back, too bad one of the good manufacturers doesn't make this beauty, even if hanwei made it i would buy it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2007 15:12:25 GMT
I have a pair of the Windlass swordsman's gloves/gauntlets and I highly recommend then. Their $40 at reliks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2007 12:02:51 GMT
I like the look of that sword, but out of curiosity, what's the difference between a saber and a cutlass? Is a saber to be used on horseback and a cutlass in naval warfare or what?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2007 1:19:26 GMT
That's about it. The saber was primarily a cavalry weapon used from horeseback, while the cutlass was a naval weapon for use on board a ship. The saber with its long blade allowed the cavalryman a good amount of reach while mounted, and the cutlass with a much shorter blade was better suited to shipboard use where maneuverability was more important. The 1751 I linked to above could best be described as a "hanger", which was a slightly shorter equivalent of the saber for use by infantrymen. Btw, the 1751 is obviously now the 3rd sword down on that page. They added a new sword to the top of the page since I first posted the link.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2007 19:46:11 GMT
With the frequently echoed thought that not all of the older swords were well tempered (especially the mass produced blades like these), how do yall think these brass hilted swords/sabers from deepeeka compare to the originals from a functional standpoint?
|
|