Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2007 5:38:40 GMT
So, I'm sitting around the house last night when, suddenly, I'm gripped by an overpowering desire to own a saber. Not just any saber, but one capable of severing arms and legs in a single blow (acording to the accompanying press, anyway). ;D What else could I do but go ahead and order one? A few mouse clicks www.bladematrix.tv/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=27728 and $212 USD later (shipping included), and I found myself the soon-to-be owner of a spiffy new 1796 Light Cavalry Saber. I know you can get these at Military Heritage cheaper, but I figured the extra $30 or so was worth it, considering my complete ineptitude at sharpening anything larger than a pocketknife (the MH ones come blunt). This is one of those swords that I've known for a long time I was going to eventually get, but something else always came up. There's just something menacing and purposeful looking about it. Since the Gen2 swords I want (aside from the Ranger sword) aren't out yet, and I haven't decided which Japanese style sword to commit to, I figured this was a good time. Will report/review upon receipt. BTW, I've ordered knives from this guy too many times to recall, and he is as solid as a rock (not to mention killer prices). Highly recommended.
|
|
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2,116
|
Post by admin on Feb 1, 2007 5:52:12 GMT
Hey, sounds like fun there Kreigschwert! (hehe - nothing like severing arms and legs in a single blow, though I wonder how that would be accomplished - hmm, the only thing I can thing of is that they were doing yoga or something and were attached while stretching their legs and holding their toes - that would do it, though a little unsporting!) Look forward to seeing the review!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2007 6:13:00 GMT
;D ;D ;D I guess I should have said an arm or a leg in a single blow...Thanks, Paul. I got a huge laugh out of that. ;D
|
|
|
Post by ShooterMike on Feb 1, 2007 17:44:45 GMT
Kreigschwert,
I have had one of the cold Steel 1796 Light Cavalry sabers for about 6 months. I never though about doing a review of it. But now you piqued my interest, and reminded me that I also have two real military issue sabers from that same period.
Hey Paul, should there be an area on the top board for "sabers" or maybe "modern military swords" or something like that? If not, where do you see discussion threads on sabers like this fitting into the forum?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2007 22:28:30 GMT
Kreigschwert, Hey Paul, should there be an area on the top board for "sabers" or maybe "modern military swords" or something like that? If not, where do you see discussion threads on sabers like this fitting into the forum? How about a Post Renaissance Swords section? Sort of a catch-all category for sabers, cutlasses, artillery swords, etc.?
|
|
|
Post by rammstein on Feb 1, 2007 23:33:22 GMT
Or leave the medeival word section as ONLY dark ages and medieval, creating a "complex hilt" forum as well. Only problem would be...not all sabres and such were complex hilted. Some were pretty simple.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2007 2:12:45 GMT
BTW, Mike, what are the two antique sabers you own?
|
|
|
Post by ShooterMike on Feb 3, 2007 5:30:06 GMT
Besides the Cold Steel 1796 I have this Austrian Model 1831 Artillery Saber and this German Saxon Model 1828 (I think?) Cavalry Saber. The German Saxon saber is nice, but the Austrian saber handles like an extension of my hand. It's about 2.5 lbs. but it handles like it's made of air! That is one awesomely nice handling sword.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2007 8:18:44 GMT
Those are amazing! Strong similarity between the hilts of the 1796 and the Austrian 1831 (makes sense though). Thanks for the pics. Actually, all three are similar, but moreso the 1796 and 1831. Do those originals have the enormously thick (by western standards, at least) blades? The Cold Steel is supposedly 5/16" (roughly 7.5mm?) thick, while an original reviewed on SFI a couple years ago measured 9mm at the spine.
|
|
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2,116
|
Post by admin on Feb 3, 2007 12:55:13 GMT
Well, I've moved this thread and created a new 'hybrid' one based on the input received here called 'Post Renaissance and Military Swords' which I think should be broad enough.
Enjoy! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2007 22:08:03 GMT
Thanks, Paul.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2007 0:11:51 GMT
I would like hear any ideas people have here regarding the use of sabers. I have not done much research regarding the fighting styles of sabers. From what I have read, I gather that they were used to slash from horseback as the horse passed by its target. It is is clear that one needs to be a well trained in horsemanship but does anyone know if there is any technique to the cut? or is this a simple swing?
I have read that Hungarian Dragoons favoried the saber very much. They had sabers that where sharpened 3/4 of the way up on the backside too. The made double cuts on their passes in a charge. First with the backside and then with the front side (or is that the other way around?). Interesting enough some of them also used Tucks. These where rod like thrusting swords with no cutting blade at all. I don't see how they could use a Tuck from a horse and be able to retrieve their blade after a thrust.
What about fighting with saber on foot? I did some clasical saber fencing, the simulator handles nothing like a real saber. Did people ever actualy duel with sabers? Any reason why someone might prefer to duel with a saber rather then a rapier or smallsword?
I read some interesting information some time back (don't remeber where), it said that of the over 700,000 men killed in the American Civil War, less then 700 were attributed to sabers. It stated that the officers that did carry sabers barely had any training in their use. It further said that the saber was more a status symbol used to lead men into battle. I read somewhere else that Napolians men carried more curved sabers and inflicted nasty but non-leathal cuts. British men who fought them, had more straigth bladed sabers that inflicted less gastly but more leathal thrusts.
Do you guys have any other thoughts or information regarding sabers use in war.
|
|
|
Post by rammstein on Feb 6, 2007 0:22:42 GMT
an estoc (tuck) did could a cutting edge and was swordlike in shape, although 99.999% of its focus with with thrusts (myarmoury's new updates features an mrl estoc!). My old sword fighting teacher told me that those who used them from horseback often found their arms dislocated because if one didn't immiediatly draw the point back, their arm would be jolted hard by the force. However, it was still a fearsome weapon and it's advantages obviously offset some of the risk because of it's shear brutal thrusting power.
|
|
|
Post by ShooterMike on Feb 6, 2007 3:11:29 GMT
Tsafa, Here is a link to an interesting piece of info. George S. Patton was the last American general to have a passion for sabers in combat. He is a very interesting character, and reading about him covers a lot of saber-related information. Here is the last U.S. Army Saber Manual, written by Patton in 1914 for use with the saber he designed. www.pattonhq.com/pdffiles/saberexercise.pdfOver the 1700-1900 timeframe, the on-going debate in military circles centered around whether the straight thrusting saber or the curved cutting saber was the better and more effective weapon for cavalry use. BTW, during the Napoleonic wars the English cavalry had the new Model 1796 Light Cavalry Saber and the French used a more straight thrust-oriented saber. The oft circulated myth was that the French complained that the heavy English saber was overly brutal and not "gentlemanly" for use on European battlefields. There's no certain record of this, but there are letters written by French Dragoon officers commenting about how severe the cuts were that resulted from its use in battle.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2007 3:22:31 GMT
Just an update: the saber should be arriving this week. Review will follow. Mike, thanks for the Patton link! Though the "Patton" saber is dramatically different from the older 1796 style sabers, I dig ALL sabers.
|
|
|
Post by ShooterMike on Feb 6, 2007 3:36:35 GMT
Yeah, George Patton was strongly in the "thrust is a must" camp.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2007 22:50:52 GMT
The funny thing is that Windlass used to sell an Indian cavalry saber through Atlanta Cutlery that was very similar to the Patton style (they had a Patton as well, which I believe they still carry), but it has recently disappeared from the AC catalog. Now, I come to find out that Windlass is apparently making a few sword models for Cold Steel, among them, the Indian cavalry saber. To me, it looks just like the one they used to sell at AC, only, it's twice as much. Darnit! I should have bought one back in the day! ;D
|
|
|
Post by rammstein on Feb 6, 2007 23:07:17 GMT
personally I foun both the patton sabre AND the indian sabre (from AC/MRL) to be incredibly unnappealing designs. Looked to me like they took a shoddy rapier blade and melted some child's plastic swords down to make an ugly green hilt. The scabbard was clunky and, frankly, very ugly.
I don't like plastic ;D
Seriously, I find that earlier sabres (sweizersabbel to civil war designs) are very sleek and wonderful designs.
Speaking of sabers...gus trim's medieval sabres are quite interesting designs! I believe they are sweizersabels.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2007 23:21:34 GMT
personally I foun both the patton sabre AND the indian sabre (from AC/MRL) to be incredibly unnappealing designs. Speaking of sabers...gus trim's medieval sabres are quite interesting designs! I believe they are sweizersabels. So did I, at first glance; however, they both grew on me as I learned more about sabers/military swords in general and how they were utilized, etc. Yes, Gus is doing some amazing sabers now. I find his longer-hilted sabers particularly appealing. Speaking of two-handed sabers, have you seen the one on Lutel's site? Freakin' amazing! If not, go to their site, click on "Catalog", then click on "Knives", and it's the first one. I don't know why it's listed as a "knife", but oh well...
|
|
|
Post by rammstein on Feb 6, 2007 23:50:15 GMT
Speaking of two-handed sabers, have you seen the one on Lutel's site? Freakin' amazing! If not, go to their site, click on "Catalog", then click on "Knives", and it's the first one. I don't know why it's listed as a "knife", but oh well... Oh damn you kriegschwert ;D! Never direct me to lutel, I always get an urge to buy things! I LOVE their sabres.
|
|