Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2008 17:30:42 GMT
Hi folks.
Here's a question for those of you - esp. who have used both the Knight and Gothic:
If you could only keep one, which would it be?
Now, I am considering myself to be more of a "bastard sword guy" so choosing between a 'true" two-hander and a one-hander is not as easy as it seems. Do you folks think that one handles inherently better than the other?
Thanks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2008 23:25:36 GMT
That would be like comparing apples and oranges. Both handle well for what they are, so choose the one you would like to have in battle.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2008 2:12:02 GMT
Well...they are two VERY different swords, so it really depends on the individual. I personally never met a XIV I didn't like so I would gravitate more towards the knight then the gothic I would think.
BTW didn't you have an eye on the gen 2 irish hand and a half? You know that AoV can shape that handle for you right? Or grab a lucerene or black prince (and all their fun customization options are still open).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2008 7:18:40 GMT
As an arming sword guy.............I'll take the longsword.
Just kidding, gimme that wonderfully tough knightly sword.
Personally, I find single-handed swords to be much more instinctive int their use (this is coming from a guy with a heavy kenjutsu background), whereas the manipulation of a blade with two hands (primarily) deals IMHO with a more scientific approach to defense. If you don't get my gist, watch scottish broadsword play and then watch the Zornhau guys go at it with their longswords.
|
|
|
Post by Jeff K. ( Jak) on Mar 14, 2008 23:45:40 GMT
The Gothic is a beauty and would be my choice of the two. I found those Zornhau guys extremely impressive (if im thinkin of the right guys....i posted a you tube vid a while ago of them goin at it in a park...) But again the fighting styles are apples and oranges too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2008 12:59:29 GMT
Thanks folks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2008 14:06:37 GMT
the gothic hands down, blunt or sharp I wouldn't care, it is absolutely exquisite.
|
|
|
Post by ShooterMike on Mar 17, 2008 14:50:14 GMT
I've handled and cut a bit with both. I would rate them just about the same within their respective types. Both are on the heavy side, even after the edge geometry is drastically filed down to make a proper sharp blade. But not horribly so.
They both handle middle of the road to me. On a 1-to-10 scale, I would give them both a 5 or 6 after they've been properly reworked with sharp edges. But that's pretty good for a sub-$300 sword. I wouldn't rate most that high.
That said, my recommendation is to get either the single-hander or the longsword, depending on what type of sword you want. As far as one being "better" than the other...I don't think you'll find that to be the case with these two.
|
|
|
Post by oos3thoo on Mar 17, 2008 19:21:34 GMT
Gothic. I am not very keen on only using one hand on a heavy sword.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2008 19:34:06 GMT
One should always play to one's strengths. I have a balanced style of fighting, both unarmed and armed, so I like a weapon that gives me the greatest possibility of quick changes and movement. I'm ambidextrous with instinctive weapons such as an arming sword, but the finesse and proper ranging that good two handed sword work requires, I'm not so good with the left hand.
But, always go with your gut.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2008 20:54:58 GMT
if you like to have a shield with you in battle, go for the knight, i have one and I am very pleased with it. But if you like to have more cutting power, go for the gothic.
|
|
|
Post by musicalpoo on Jan 24, 2009 0:18:35 GMT
I bought the gothic, and I definitely stand by my decision. The black knight is one of the few DSA swords that aren't peened, and the gothic, even if it wasn't peened, is sturdy as hell. But, the gothic sword is peened, and the Black Knight is not, so in a durability contest, the Gothic wins. But there is no doubt that the black knight is a good sword, though if your going to sharpen it, it's not recommended due to the bluing of the steel.
cheers!
|
|
|
Post by shadowhowler on Jan 24, 2009 8:49:30 GMT
I bought the gothic, and I definitely stand by my decision. The black knight is one of the few DSA swords that aren't peened, and the gothic, even if it wasn't peened, is sturdy as hell. But, the gothic sword is peened, and the Black Knight is not, so in a durability contest, the Gothic wins. He didn't say the Black Knight, just the Knight... they are two different swords. Also, the peening of DSA swords is a new thing. For me... like others have said your talking about two VERY different swords... so it's a bad comparasion. However, if forced to chose, I'd pick the Gothic two handed sword. I find it very attractive, and with the long handled easy to control. The Knight sword may be lighter... but it's a single handed weapon. With both hands on the gothic, I feel more comfortable then I do with one hand on the knight.
|
|
|
Post by musicalpoo on Jan 26, 2009 17:49:10 GMT
ooooooh, hehe sorry, in that case I have no idea, from Paul's review of the knight sword, it kicks butt as well. I think it comes down to "do you want a two handed or a one handed"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2009 22:00:44 GMT
Yeah really does, I got the gothic and I love it, BUT I think my hands, body motion and instinct is more suited to single handers so I KINDA regret not getting the knight, but hey not like the gothic is bad or anything ......... hey I'm a case of not choosing the most suitable FORM of sword rather then quality or aesthetics
|
|