Aaron
Member
Senior Forumite
Posts: 2,369
|
Post by Aaron on Jul 20, 2011 18:26:23 GMT
Just as a quick update, in the other thread I mentioned how I would be wary of using United Cutlery's hilt pieces on a functional blade; all they have listed anywhere is that they are "solid metal" which probably means they are a cheap zinc alloy plated with some other metal, and thus not useable on a functional sword. Google failed me as well, apparently no one (at least on the first ten or so pages on Google) had bothered to look into what kind of metal was used.
So I went ahead and emailed United Cutlery asking what alloy is used, whether it IS just a zinc alloy or if they do indeed use steel. I'll post here what they say if/when I get a response.
If they are steel (which I doubt, but it would be nice) then it would be very easy for one to make a functional replica that's damn close to screen-accurate. Just drill through the pommel and get a new blade made and you're set.
Edited to add: And since the tang on the Ranger is surprisingly beefy, one may even be able to get away with using the grip as well, as long as the grip isn't a really crappy wood or damaged.
|
|
|
Post by Everguard on Jul 24, 2011 1:46:10 GMT
Wouldn't it be easier in the end to just etch some runes on to the already functional DSA pommel? I don't know much about sword design, but I would have to assume that changing the pommel on the sword would definitely change the balance of the sword, possibly for the worse.
As a side-note, I remember seeing some do-it-yourself etching guides on the old forum using really basic components. The hardest part would be getting the runes on to some type of stencil to do the etch, and even then you're talking a total project cost somewhere around 20 bucks instead of having to buy two swords and frankenstein them.
|
|
Aaron
Member
Senior Forumite
Posts: 2,369
|
Post by Aaron on Jul 30, 2011 0:22:39 GMT
Just heard back from United Cutlery, the fittings are indeed a zinc-aluminum alloy.
|
|
|
Post by nddave on Aug 1, 2011 14:28:53 GMT
I thought the reason the dsa and gen2 type lotr swords were not 100% accurate was because they're not officialy licensed?
|
|
|
Post by Elheru Aran on Aug 1, 2011 15:12:28 GMT
The DSA swords *are* 'officially licensed', however their design varies somewhat because I think United still holds the rights to the Weta designs or something; Eyal could probably give a better answer. The Gen2 swords definitely aren't 'official' as far as I know.
|
|
|
Post by nddave on Aug 1, 2011 16:14:08 GMT
didn't know dsa had a license. also does weta do more than lord of the rings?
|
|